Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run
Instinct vs Skydive
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Instinct's 7.5 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do proactive personal assistants.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1245 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Instinct F
Best for People who want to hand errands to an assistant by text or phone.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Skydive loses 5 points for them
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Skydive D
Best for A person or team who wants hosted agents with their own cloud computers, memory and connected apps, reachable in Slack, email, text and a CLI, and who can drive them from scripts through the CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 41 against 10
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 0
- Agent ergonomics, 59 against 0
- Security & auth, 59 against 3
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 56 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 55
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The API has no operation for sending an agent a task. That runs through the CLI's chat -p, outside the OpenAPI contract.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Instinct | Skydive | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 10 | 41 | Skydive +31 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 0 | 81 | Skydive +81 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 59 | Skydive +59 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 3 | 59 | Skydive +56 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 35 | Skydive +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 2 | 56 | Skydive +54 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 55 | 75 | Skydive +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | F 7.5/100 | D 52.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Instinct | Skydive |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Spear Street Technology, Inc. (d/b/a Instinct) | Create, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.skydive.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Instinct's Terms of Service (Spear Street Technology, Inc. d/b/a Instinct, last revised 26 August 2026). | Closed service under the Skydive Terms of Service (Create, Inc.), effective 29 July 2026. The skydive-cli npm package is published under the MIT licence. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-08-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-26 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-26 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | none | 5.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Instinct
Instinct is a hosted assistant reached by text or call that acts in the owner's Google Workspace and WhatsApp and can make purchases. No outside agent can call it, no price is published, new sign-ups may meet a capacity waitlist, and materials train models unless the owner opts out.
Skydive
Skydive publishes an OpenAPI 3.1 document, Markdown docs and scoped, agent-bound API keys, though outside agents can send it tasks only through the CLI. Its status page records several major incidents, including a 25-hour Agent Hosting outage, and its home and pricing pages say data is never used for training while the privacy policy turns training on by default.
Before you call either
Instinct
- Don't look for an endpoint. app.instinct.com/mcp serves the web app shell and refuses POST with 405.
- Confirm any purchase with the owner. The terms say Actions may not be reversible.
Skydive
- Send tasks with
skydive chat -p "..." --agent <id> --jsonand pass--conversation <id>from the JSON to keep context. The REST API can't send a task. - Don't retry
chat -por a create blindly after a timeout. There's no idempotency key, so list agents or keys before retrying. - Ask the owner for an agent-bound
usekey when you only need to read. Account-leveleditkeys can create agents and mint keys. - Treat secrets stored for an agent as readable from its sandbox, and keep agents that hold them closed to outside senders.
- Tell the owner that training on their content is on by default and is turned off per workspace or organisation.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Instinct or Skydive?
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Instinct's 7.5 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Instinct or Skydive
- asaply vs Instinct
- asaply vs Skydive
- Asmi vs Instinct
- Asmi vs Skydive
- Boba vs Instinct
- Boba vs Skydive
- Brea vs Instinct
- Brea vs Skydive
- Del vs Instinct
- Del vs Skydive
- HireAlpha vs Instinct
- HireAlpha vs Skydive
- Instinct vs OpenInstinct
- Instinct vs Orbits
- Instinct vs Orchid
- Instinct vs szn
- Instinct vs Tab
- Instinct vs Zapia
- OpenInstinct vs Skydive
- Orbits vs Skydive
- Orchid vs Skydive
- AstrBot vs Instinct
- AstrBot vs Skydive
- Boski vs Instinct
- Boski vs Skydive
- Caddy vs Instinct
- Caddy vs Skydive
- Claude Duet vs Instinct
- Claude Duet vs Skydive
- CowAgent vs Instinct
- CowAgent vs Skydive
- folk vs Instinct
- folk vs Skydive
- GAIA vs Instinct
- GAIA vs Skydive
- Gemini Spark vs Instinct
- Gemini Spark vs Skydive
- Grok Bot vs Instinct
- Grok Bot vs Skydive
- Haven vs Instinct
- Haven vs Skydive
- Hermes Agent vs Instinct
- Hermes Agent vs Skydive
- Instinct vs IronClaw
- Instinct vs Leon
- Instinct vs Lindy
- Instinct vs Lobby
- Instinct vs nanobot
- Instinct vs NanoClaw
- Instinct vs Dots
- Instinct vs OpenClaw
- Instinct vs OpenDuet
- Instinct vs PicoClaw
- Instinct vs Poke
- Instinct vs QwenPaw
- Instinct vs Tasker AI
- Instinct vs Town
- Instinct vs ZeroClaw
- Instinct vs Zo Computer
- IronClaw vs Skydive
- Leon vs Skydive
- Lindy vs Skydive
- nanobot vs Skydive
- NanoClaw vs Skydive
- Dots vs Skydive
- OpenClaw vs Skydive
- OpenDuet vs Skydive
- PicoClaw vs Skydive
- Poke vs Skydive
- QwenPaw vs Skydive
- Atticus vs Instinct
- Atticus vs Skydive
- DeepTutor vs Instinct
- DeepTutor vs Skydive
- Hark Pro vs Instinct
- Hark Pro vs Skydive
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Skydive
- Skydive vs szn
- Skydive vs Tab
- Skydive vs Talorys
- Skydive vs Tasker AI
- Skydive vs Tomo
- Skydive vs Town
- Skydive vs Wajo (Fo)
- Skydive vs Zapia
- Skydive vs ZeroClaw
- Skydive vs Zo Computer
- Instinct vs Natura tinyNature
- Instinct vs Pally
- Instinct vs Tomo
- Instinct vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Skydive
- Natura tinyNature vs Skydive
- Pally vs Skydive
Disclosure
Instinct competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Skydive competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/instinct-vs-skydive.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/instinct.json·/api/v1/tools/skydive.json - From a terminal
anchor compare instinct skydive(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "instinct", "b": "skydive"}at/mcp, no key