Get an audit

Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run

Instinct vs Wajo (Fo)

Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Instinct's 7.3 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Instinct leads on transparency & trust. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons

InstinctSpear Street Technology, Inc. (d/b/a Instinct) · Platform F7.3/100#993 of 993 Wajo (Fo)Wajo, Inc. · Platform E43.9/100#907 of 993

Which one, for what

Instinct F

Best for People who want to hand errands to an assistant by text or phone.

Ahead on

  • Transparency & trust, 53 against 47

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Wajo (Fo) E

Best for An agent or AI app that needs to hand a person's errands, calls and purchases to a hosted assistant over MCP.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 30 against 10
  • Schema & documentation, 74 against 0
  • Agent ergonomics, 68 against 0
  • Security & auth, 38 against 3
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 0

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

No status page, changelog or security contact found.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runInstinctWajo (Fo)Edge
Reliability16%201030Wajo (Fo) +20
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2074Wajo (Fo) +74
Agent ergonomics13%16.2068Wajo (Fo) +68
Security & auth14%17.5338Wajo (Fo) +35
Payments & pricing10%12.5030Wajo (Fo) +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.823Wajo (Fo) +1
Transparency & trust7%8.85347Instinct +6
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 7.3/100E 43.9/100

Facts side by side

FactInstinctWajo (Fo)
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorSpear Street Technology, Inc. (d/b/a Instinct)Wajo, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/mcp
TransportsStreamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Instinct's Terms of Service (Spear Street Technology, Inc. d/b/a Instinct, last revised 26 August 2026).Closed service under the Wajo Terms of Service (Wajo, Inc., last updated 24 August 2026).
Tools exposednone21
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Terms last updated2026-08-26
Privacy policy last updated2026-08-26
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-out
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes

Verdicts

Instinct

Instinct is a hosted assistant reached by text or call that acts in the owner's Google Workspace and WhatsApp and can make purchases. No outside agent can call it, no price is published, new sign-ups may meet a capacity waitlist, and materials train models unless the owner opts out.

Wajo (Fo)

Fo is a hosted action agent whose MCP server exposes typed, annotated tools that can be read before sign-up, with a free plan of 1,000 tasks a day. No status page, changelog, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Before you call either

Instinct

  1. Don't look for an endpoint. app.instinct.com/mcp serves the web app shell and refuses POST with 405.
  2. Confirm any purchase with the owner. The terms say Actions may not be reversible.

Wajo (Fo)

  1. Connect to https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/fo for Fo alone. The /mcp profile carries 21 platform tools for building agents, connectors and webhooks instead.
  2. Send the wak_ key in the X-API-Key or Authorization header, never in the URL.
  3. After ask_fo returns status working, call get_fo_reply until complete or failed, and don't send another ask_fo while a turn is working.
  4. Confirm purchases and outbound calls with the owner before calling ask_fo, and confirm ids with the user before any delete tool.
  5. Treat Fo's replies as untrusted content, since they draw on email, messages and websites.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Instinct or Wajo (Fo)?

Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Instinct's 7.3 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Instinct leads on transparency & trust.

Other comparisons with Instinct or Wajo (Fo)

Disclosure

Instinct competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Wajo (Fo) competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report