Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run
Wajo (Fo) vs Zo Computer
Wajo (Fo) and Zo Computer score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 43.9 (E) and 43.1 (E). Zo Computer leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for An agent or AI app that needs to hand a person's errands, calls and purchases to a hosted assistant over MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 30 against 15
- Agent ergonomics, 68 against 34
Watch for
No status page, changelog or security contact found.
Best for One person who wants a hosted assistant with its own Linux machine, reachable by text message and chat apps, and who accepts that the assistant acts on connected accounts without a documented approval step.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 68 against 3
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 47
Watch for
The access token for the API and MCP endpoint grants full access to the workspace, with no scoped or read-only token documented
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Wajo (Fo) | Zo Computer | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 30 | 15 | Wajo (Fo) +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 74 | 73 | Wajo (Fo) +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 68 | 34 | Wajo (Fo) +34 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 38 | 37 | Wajo (Fo) +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 40 | Zo Computer +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 3 | 68 | Zo Computer +65 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 47 | 60 | Zo Computer +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 43.9/100 | E 43.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Wajo (Fo) | Zo Computer |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Wajo, Inc. | Zo Computer Company |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/mcp | https://api.zo.computer/mcp |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under the Wajo Terms of Service (Wajo, Inc., last updated 24 August 2026). | Proprietary service under Zo Computer Company's terms of service |
| Tools exposed | 21 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-14 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-08-08 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-20 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |
Verdicts
Wajo (Fo)
Fo is a hosted action agent whose MCP server exposes typed, annotated tools that can be read before sign-up, with a free plan of 1,000 tasks a day. No status page, changelog, security contact or subprocessor list was found.
Zo Computer
Zo publishes an OpenAPI file, Markdown docs, plan prices and a named list of the providers that receive user content. One access token grants full access to the workspace, no approval step before sending or buying was found in the reviewed docs, and no status page, rate limit or SLA is published.
Before you call either
Wajo (Fo)
- Connect to https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/fo for Fo alone. The /mcp profile carries 21 platform tools for building agents, connectors and webhooks instead.
- Send the wak_ key in the X-API-Key or Authorization header, never in the URL.
- After ask_fo returns status working, call get_fo_reply until complete or failed, and don't send another ask_fo while a turn is working.
- Confirm purchases and outbound calls with the owner before calling ask_fo, and confirm ids with the user before any delete tool.
- Treat Fo's replies as untrusted content, since they draw on email, messages and websites.
Zo Computer
- Send
POST https://api.zo.computer/zo/askwithAuthorization: Bearer zo_sk_...and aninputstring. The owner creates the token under Settings > Advanced - Pass
persona_idfor a persona with a narrow tool set. The token itself carries every permission the owner has - Set
memory_modetooffto keep workspace memory out of a request. The field is in the OpenAPI file and absent from the API guide - Do not retry
/zo/askblindly after a timeout. No idempotency key is documented and the request may already have sent a message - Append
.mdto any guide or reference URL for Markdown
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Wajo (Fo) or Zo Computer?
Wajo (Fo) and Zo Computer score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 43.9 (E) and 43.1 (E). Zo Computer leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Can an agent call Wajo (Fo) and Zo Computer without installing anything?
Yes. Wajo (Fo) has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/mcp and Zo Computer at https://api.zo.computer/mcp.
Other comparisons with Wajo (Fo) or Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs Zo Computer
- CowAgent vs Zo Computer
- GAIA vs Zo Computer
- Gemini Spark vs Zo Computer
- Grok Bot vs Zo Computer
- Haven vs Zo Computer
- Hermes Agent vs Zo Computer
- Instinct vs Zo Computer
- IronClaw vs Zo Computer
- Leon vs Zo Computer
- Lindy vs Zo Computer
- nanobot vs Zo Computer
- NanoClaw vs Zo Computer
- Dots vs Zo Computer
- OpenClaw vs Zo Computer
- PicoClaw vs Zo Computer
- Poke vs Zo Computer
- QwenPaw vs Zo Computer
- ZeroClaw vs Zo Computer
- CowAgent vs Wajo (Fo)
- GAIA vs Wajo (Fo)
- Gemini Spark vs Wajo (Fo)
- Grok Bot vs Wajo (Fo)
- Haven vs Wajo (Fo)
- Hermes Agent vs Wajo (Fo)
- Instinct vs Wajo (Fo)
- IronClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Leon vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)
- nanobot vs Wajo (Fo)
- NanoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Natura tinyNature vs Wajo (Fo)
- Natura tinyNature vs Zo Computer
- Dots vs Wajo (Fo)
- OpenClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Pally vs Wajo (Fo)
- Pally vs Zo Computer
- Poke vs Wajo (Fo)
- QwenPaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tomo vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tomo vs Zo Computer
- Wajo (Fo) vs ZeroClaw
- PicoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Talorys vs Wajo (Fo)
- Talorys vs Zo Computer
Disclosure
Wajo (Fo) competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/wajo-vs-zo-computer.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/wajo.json·/api/v1/tools/zo-computer.json - From a terminal
anchor compare wajo zo-computer(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "wajo", "b": "zo-computer"}at/mcp, no key