Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
Orbits vs Zo Computer
Zo Computer scores 43.1 (E) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Orbits F
Best for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No public agent API, as llms.txt states.
Best for One person who wants a hosted assistant with its own Linux machine, reachable by text message and chat apps, and who accepts that the assistant acts on connected accounts without a documented approval step.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 73 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 34 against 0
- Security & auth, 37 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 68 against 54
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 43
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
The access token for the API and MCP endpoint grants full access to the workspace, with no scoped or read-only token documented
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Orbits | Zo Computer | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 15 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 73 | Zo Computer +63 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 34 | Zo Computer +34 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 37 | Zo Computer +37 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 40 | Zo Computer +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 54 | 68 | Zo Computer +14 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 43 | 60 | Zo Computer +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 15.6/100 | E 43.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Orbits | Zo Computer |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Nemus AI, Inc. | Zo Computer Company |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.zo.computer/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.). | Proprietary service under Zo Computer Company's terms of service |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-09-14 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-08-08 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-20 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |
Verdicts
Orbits
Orbits is a family household app whose assistant, Bit, runs shared calendars, lists and meals, reads household email and places restaurant calls after approval, with iOS releases every week or two. No outside agent can call it, prices appear only as App Store in-app purchases, and no status page, security contact or named subprocessors were found.
Zo Computer
Zo publishes an OpenAPI file, Markdown docs, plan prices and a named list of the providers that receive user content. One access token grants full access to the workspace, no approval step before sending or buying was found in the reviewed docs, and no status page, rate limit or SLA is published.
Before you call either
Orbits
- Don't plan to call Orbits from another agent. llms.txt says no public agent API is offered.
- Tell the owner the assistant needs an Orbits subscription bought in the app, and that any trial appears only at purchase.
Zo Computer
- Send
POST https://api.zo.computer/zo/askwithAuthorization: Bearer zo_sk_...and aninputstring. The owner creates the token under Settings > Advanced - Pass
persona_idfor a persona with a narrow tool set. The token itself carries every permission the owner has - Set
memory_modetooffto keep workspace memory out of a request. The field is in the OpenAPI file and absent from the API guide - Do not retry
/zo/askblindly after a timeout. No idempotency key is documented and the request may already have sent a message - Append
.mdto any guide or reference URL for Markdown
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Orbits or Zo Computer?
Zo Computer scores 43.1 (E) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Can an agent call Orbits and Zo Computer without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Orbits. Zo Computer has a hosted endpoint at https://api.zo.computer/mcp.
Other comparisons with Orbits or Zo Computer
- asaply vs Orbits
- asaply vs Zo Computer
- Asmi vs Orbits
- Asmi vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs Orbits
- Boba vs Orbits
- Boba vs Zo Computer
- Boski vs Orbits
- Brea vs Orbits
- Brea vs Zo Computer
- Caddy vs Orbits
- CowAgent vs Orbits
- Del vs Orbits
- Del vs Zo Computer
- folk vs Orbits
- GAIA vs Orbits
- Grok Bot vs Orbits
- Haven vs Orbits
- Hermes Agent vs Orbits
- HireAlpha vs Orbits
- HireAlpha vs Zo Computer
- Instinct vs Orbits
- IronClaw vs Orbits
- Lindy vs Orbits
- nanobot vs Orbits
- NanoClaw vs Orbits
- Dots vs Orbits
- OpenClaw vs Orbits
- OpenInstinct vs Orbits
- OpenInstinct vs Zo Computer
- Orbits vs Orchid
- Orbits vs Pally
- Orbits vs PicoClaw
- Orbits vs Poke
- Orbits vs QwenPaw
- Orbits vs szn
- Orbits vs Tab
- Orbits vs Tomo
- Orbits vs Town
- Orbits vs Zapia
- Orbits vs ZeroClaw
- Orchid vs Zo Computer
- szn vs Zo Computer
- Tab vs Zo Computer
- Zapia vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs Zo Computer
- Boski vs Zo Computer
- Caddy vs Zo Computer
- CowAgent vs Zo Computer
- folk vs Zo Computer
- GAIA vs Zo Computer
- Gemini Spark vs Zo Computer
- Grok Bot vs Zo Computer
- Haven vs Zo Computer
- Hermes Agent vs Zo Computer
- Instinct vs Zo Computer
- IronClaw vs Zo Computer
- Leon vs Zo Computer
- Lindy vs Zo Computer
- nanobot vs Zo Computer
- NanoClaw vs Zo Computer
- Dots vs Zo Computer
- OpenClaw vs Zo Computer
- PicoClaw vs Zo Computer
- Poke vs Zo Computer
- QwenPaw vs Zo Computer
- Town vs Zo Computer
- ZeroClaw vs Zo Computer
- Gemini Spark vs Orbits
- Leon vs Orbits
- Natura tinyNature vs Orbits
- Natura tinyNature vs Zo Computer
- Orbits vs Wajo (Fo)
- Pally vs Zo Computer
- Tomo vs Zo Computer
- Wajo (Fo) vs Zo Computer
- Orbits vs Talorys
- Talorys vs Zo Computer
Disclosure
Orbits competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/orbits-vs-zo-computer.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/orbits.json·/api/v1/tools/zo-computer.json - From a terminal
anchor compare orbits zo-computer(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "orbits", "b": "zo-computer"}at/mcp, no key