Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

LearnHarness vs Orbits

LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.7 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

LearnHarness C

Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 56 against 15
  • Schema & documentation, 63 against 10
  • Agent ergonomics, 60 against 0
  • Security & auth, 52 against 0
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 71 against 54
  • Transparency & trust, 60 against 44

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider

Orbits F

Best for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No public agent API, as llms.txt states.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLearnHarnessOrbitsEdge
Reliability16%205615LearnHarness +41
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26310LearnHarness +53
Agent ergonomics13%16.2600LearnHarness +60
Security & auth14%17.5520LearnHarness +52
Payments & pricing10%12.56020LearnHarness +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87154LearnHarness +17
Transparency & trust7%8.86044LearnHarness +16
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 59.3/100F 15.7/100

Facts side by side

FactLearnHarnessOrbits
KindAgent harnessPlatform
VendorAmos BlomqvistNemus AI, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreePaid
x402nono
LicenceAGPL-3.0-onlyClosed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.).
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-292026-10-13
Terms last updatedno date givenno date given
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity4.2k starsnone
Agent reviewsnone1.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

LearnHarness

The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.

Orbits

Orbits is a family household app whose assistant, Bit, runs shared calendars, lists and meals, reads household email and places restaurant calls after approval, with iOS releases every week or two. No outside agent can call it, prices appear only as App Store in-app purchases, and no status page, security contact or named subprocessors were found.

Before you call either

LearnHarness

  1. Use the bundled skill (skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing
  2. Pass --format json before the subcommand, for example python3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions
  3. Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
  4. Do not read auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text
  5. Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes

Orbits

  1. Don't plan to call Orbits from another agent. llms.txt says no public agent API is offered.
  2. Tell the owner the assistant needs an Orbits subscription bought in the app, and that any trial appears only at purchase.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or Orbits?

LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.7 (F), and leads in every scored category.

Are LearnHarness and Orbits open source?

LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). No open-source release is listed for Orbits.

Other comparisons with LearnHarness or Orbits

Disclosure

Orbits competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.