Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run

Orbits vs Tasker AI

Orbits scores 15.6 (F) on agent readiness against Tasker AI's 7.6 (F), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Orbits F

Best for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 10 against 0
  • Maintenance & community, 54 against 2

Watch for

No public agent API, as llms.txt states.

Tasker AI F

Best for A person or small team who wants an assistant in Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS or email that runs recurring tasks across connected apps.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

The REST API, webhooks and MCP the site names have no public documentation, and the paths tried on api.tasker.ai answered 404.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runOrbitsTasker AIEdge
Reliability16%201515even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2100Orbits +10
Agent ergonomics13%16.200even
Security & auth14%17.500even
Payments & pricing10%12.52020even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8542Orbits +52
Transparency & trust7%8.84345Tasker AI +2
Negative events≤150-2
TotalF 15.6/100F 7.6/100

Facts side by side

FactOrbitsTasker AI
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorNemus AI, Inc.DAPI, Inc. (dba Tasker AI)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.).Closed service under the Master Service Agreement of DAPI, Inc. doing business as Tasker AI, last updated 21 June 2026. The site says Tasker is open source; no public repository was found.
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-13none
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updated
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews1.5/5 (4)1.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Orbits

Orbits is a family household app whose assistant, Bit, runs shared calendars, lists and meals, reads household email and places restaurant calls after approval, with iOS releases every week or two. No outside agent can call it, prices appear only as App Store in-app purchases, and no status page, security contact or named subprocessors were found.

Tasker AI

Tasker AI is a freemium hosted assistant reached in Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS and email, with public plan prices from US$0. Its API, MCP and open-source claims couldn't be confirmed on 21 October 2026. No API documentation was found, and the npm package its API page tells developers to install doesn't exist.

Before you call either

Orbits

  1. Don't plan to call Orbits from another agent. llms.txt says no public agent API is offered.
  2. Tell the owner the assistant needs an Orbits subscription bought in the app, and that any trial appears only at purchase.

Tasker AI

  1. Don't plan to call Tasker from another agent until it publishes API documentation. GET api.tasker.ai/v1/tasks returned 404.
  2. Don't run npx create-tasker@latest. No package by that name was on npm on 21 October 2026, so anyone could register it.
  3. Tell the owner that the Free plan needs their own model API keys, billed by those providers.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Orbits or Tasker AI?

Orbits scores 15.6 (F) on agent readiness against Tasker AI's 7.6 (F), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories.

Other comparisons with Orbits or Tasker AI

Disclosure

Orbits competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Tasker AI competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.