Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run
Caddy vs Tasker AI
Caddy scores 16.7 (F) on agent readiness against Tasker AI's 7.6 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Tasker AI leads on reliability. Both do proactive personal assistants.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Caddy F
Best for People who want a free assistant in iMessage or RCS that watches mail, calendars and work tools and asks before acting.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 10 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 55 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 52 against 45
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Best for A person or small team who wants an assistant in Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS or email that runs recurring tasks across connected apps.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 15 against 10
Watch for
The REST API, webhooks and MCP the site names have no public documentation, and the paths tried on api.tasker.ai answered 404.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Caddy | Tasker AI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 10 | 15 | Tasker AI +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 0 | Caddy +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 0 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 0 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 20 | Caddy +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 55 | 2 | Caddy +53 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 52 | 45 | Caddy +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | F 16.7/100 | F 7.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Caddy | Tasker AI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Caddy Technologies Inc. | DAPI, Inc. (dba Tasker AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Caddy's Terms of Service (Caddy Technologies Inc., last updated 27 April 2026). | Closed service under the Master Service Agreement of DAPI, Inc. doing business as Tasker AI, last updated 21 June 2026. The site says Tasker is open source; no public repository was found. |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-13 | none |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | ||
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 1.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Caddy
Caddy is a free iMessage and RCS assistant in public beta that watches connected mail, calendars and work apps and asks before sending email or changing data. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found, though its iOS app ships every week or two.
Tasker AI
Tasker AI is a freemium hosted assistant reached in Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS and email, with public plan prices from US$0. Its API, MCP and open-source claims couldn't be confirmed on 21 October 2026. No API documentation was found, and the npm package its API page tells developers to install doesn't exist.
Before you call either
Caddy
- Don't plan to call Caddy from another agent. It answers the owner's text messages, Siri and group chats it's added to.
- Expect Caddy to ask the owner before it sends email or creates an invite.
Tasker AI
- Don't plan to call Tasker from another agent until it publishes API documentation. GET api.tasker.ai/v1/tasks returned 404.
- Don't run npx create-tasker@latest. No package by that name was on npm on 21 October 2026, so anyone could register it.
- Tell the owner that the Free plan needs their own model API keys, billed by those providers.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Caddy or Tasker AI?
Caddy scores 16.7 (F) on agent readiness against Tasker AI's 7.6 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Tasker AI leads on reliability.
Other comparisons with Caddy or Tasker AI
- asaply vs Caddy
- asaply vs Tasker AI
- Asmi vs Caddy
- Asmi vs Tasker AI
- Boba vs Caddy
- Boba vs Tasker AI
- Brea vs Caddy
- Brea vs Tasker AI
- Caddy vs Del
- Caddy vs HireAlpha
- Caddy vs OpenInstinct
- Caddy vs Orbits
- Caddy vs Orchid
- Caddy vs szn
- Caddy vs Tab
- Caddy vs Zapia
- Del vs Tasker AI
- HireAlpha vs Tasker AI
- OpenInstinct vs Tasker AI
- Orbits vs Tasker AI
- Orchid vs Tasker AI
- szn vs Tasker AI
- Tab vs Tasker AI
- Tasker AI vs Tomo
- Tasker AI vs Town
- Tasker AI vs Zapia
- Tasker AI vs ZeroClaw
- Tasker AI vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs Caddy
- AstrBot vs Tasker AI
- Boski vs Caddy
- Boski vs Tasker AI
- Caddy vs CowAgent
- Caddy vs folk
- Caddy vs GAIA
- Caddy vs Gemini Spark
- Caddy vs Grok Bot
- Caddy vs Haven
- Caddy vs Hermes Agent
- Caddy vs Instinct
- Caddy vs IronClaw
- Caddy vs Leon
- Caddy vs Lindy
- Caddy vs Lobby
- Caddy vs nanobot
- Caddy vs NanoClaw
- Caddy vs Dots
- Caddy vs OpenClaw
- Caddy vs PicoClaw
- Caddy vs Poke
- Caddy vs QwenPaw
- Caddy vs Town
- Caddy vs ZeroClaw
- Caddy vs Zo Computer
- CowAgent vs Tasker AI
- folk vs Tasker AI
- GAIA vs Tasker AI
- Gemini Spark vs Tasker AI
- Grok Bot vs Tasker AI
- Haven vs Tasker AI
- Hermes Agent vs Tasker AI
- Instinct vs Tasker AI
- IronClaw vs Tasker AI
- Leon vs Tasker AI
- Lindy vs Tasker AI
- nanobot vs Tasker AI
- NanoClaw vs Tasker AI
- Dots vs Tasker AI
- OpenClaw vs Tasker AI
- PicoClaw vs Tasker AI
- Poke vs Tasker AI
- QwenPaw vs Tasker AI
- Caddy vs Natura tinyNature
- Caddy vs Pally
- Caddy vs Tomo
- Caddy vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Tasker AI
- Natura tinyNature vs Tasker AI
- Pally vs Tasker AI
- Tasker AI vs Wajo (Fo)
- Atticus vs Caddy
- Atticus vs Tasker AI
- Caddy vs Hark Pro
- Caddy vs Talorys
- Hark Pro vs Tasker AI
- Talorys vs Tasker AI
Disclosure
Caddy competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Tasker AI competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/caddy-app-vs-tasker-ai.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/caddy-app.json·/api/v1/tools/tasker-ai.json - From a terminal
anchor compare caddy-app tasker-ai(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "caddy-app", "b": "tasker-ai"}at/mcp, no key