Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run
Poke vs Tasker AI
Poke scores 37.6 (F) on agent readiness against Tasker AI's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do proactive personal assistants.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Poke F
Best for One person who wants an assistant in their text messages that reads and drafts mail, manages a calendar and reaches other apps through MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 51 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 42 against 0
- Agent ergonomics, 30 against 0
- Security & auth, 24 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 31 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 58 against 45
Watch for
No documented setting for which actions need approval before Poke sends, deletes or spends. Release notes mention email draft approval only in passing
Best for A person or small team who wants an assistant in Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS or email that runs recurring tasks across connected apps.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
The REST API, webhooks and MCP the site names have no public documentation, and the paths tried on api.tasker.ai answered 404.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Poke | Tasker AI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 51 | 15 | Poke +36 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 42 | 0 | Poke +42 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 30 | 0 | Poke +30 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 24 | 0 | Poke +24 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 20 | Poke +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 31 | 2 | Poke +29 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 58 | 45 | Poke +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | F 37.6/100 | F 7.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Poke | Tasker AI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | The Interaction Company of California Inc. | DAPI, Inc. (dba Tasker AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Poke's Terms of Service. The poke npm package (CLI and Node.js SDK) declares MIT | Closed service under the Master Service Agreement of DAPI, Inc. doing business as Tasker AI, last updated 21 June 2026. The site says Tasker is open source; no public repository was found. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-06-25 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-03-17 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-11 | |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 1.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Poke
Hosted assistant that answers in Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram and RCS and acts in Gmail, Outlook, calendars and MCP servers. Plan prices and a status page are public. No approval settings, credential storage, model providers or retention periods are documented, and customer content trains models unless Maximum Privacy is selected.
Tasker AI
Tasker AI is a freemium hosted assistant reached in Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS and email, with public plan prices from US$0. Its API, MCP and open-source claims couldn't be confirmed on 21 October 2026. No API documentation was found, and the npm package its API page tells developers to install doesn't exist.
Before you call either
Poke
- POST JSON to
https://poke.com/api/v1/inbound/api-messagewith a Bearer key from Kitchen. Legacypk_keys work only on the deprecated/api/v1/inbound-sms/webhook - Expect only
{"success": true}back. Poke's answer goes to the owner's message thread, not to the caller - Do not retry a POST blindly. No idempotency key is documented, and a repeated message may make Poke act twice
- Treat an API key as full access to the owner's mail, calendar and integrations. Create one key per automation and revoke it when done
- Avoid the prefilled integration link with
apiKeyin the query string for real secrets. Enter the key in the form or usenpx poke@latest mcp add -k
Tasker AI
- Don't plan to call Tasker from another agent until it publishes API documentation. GET api.tasker.ai/v1/tasks returned 404.
- Don't run npx create-tasker@latest. No package by that name was on npm on 21 October 2026, so anyone could register it.
- Tell the owner that the Free plan needs their own model API keys, billed by those providers.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Poke or Tasker AI?
Poke scores 37.6 (F) on agent readiness against Tasker AI's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Poke or Tasker AI
- asaply vs Poke
- asaply vs Tasker AI
- Asmi vs Poke
- Asmi vs Tasker AI
- Boba vs Poke
- Boba vs Tasker AI
- Brea vs Poke
- Brea vs Tasker AI
- Del vs Poke
- Del vs Tasker AI
- HireAlpha vs Poke
- HireAlpha vs Tasker AI
- OpenInstinct vs Poke
- OpenInstinct vs Tasker AI
- Orbits vs Poke
- Orbits vs Tasker AI
- Orchid vs Poke
- Orchid vs Tasker AI
- Poke vs szn
- Poke vs Tab
- Poke vs Zapia
- szn vs Tasker AI
- Tab vs Tasker AI
- Tasker AI vs Tomo
- Tasker AI vs Town
- Tasker AI vs Zapia
- Tasker AI vs ZeroClaw
- Tasker AI vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs Poke
- AstrBot vs Tasker AI
- Boski vs Poke
- Boski vs Tasker AI
- Caddy vs Poke
- Caddy vs Tasker AI
- CowAgent vs Poke
- CowAgent vs Tasker AI
- folk vs Poke
- folk vs Tasker AI
- GAIA vs Poke
- GAIA vs Tasker AI
- Gemini Spark vs Poke
- Gemini Spark vs Tasker AI
- Grok Bot vs Poke
- Grok Bot vs Tasker AI
- Haven vs Poke
- Haven vs Tasker AI
- Hermes Agent vs Poke
- Hermes Agent vs Tasker AI
- Instinct vs Poke
- Instinct vs Tasker AI
- IronClaw vs Poke
- IronClaw vs Tasker AI
- Leon vs Poke
- Leon vs Tasker AI
- Lindy vs Poke
- Lindy vs Tasker AI
- nanobot vs Poke
- nanobot vs Tasker AI
- NanoClaw vs Poke
- NanoClaw vs Tasker AI
- Dots vs Poke
- Dots vs Tasker AI
- OpenClaw vs Poke
- OpenClaw vs Tasker AI
- PicoClaw vs Poke
- PicoClaw vs Tasker AI
- Poke vs QwenPaw
- Poke vs Town
- Poke vs ZeroClaw
- Poke vs Zo Computer
- QwenPaw vs Tasker AI
- Lobby vs Poke
- Lobby vs Tasker AI
- Natura tinyNature vs Poke
- Natura tinyNature vs Tasker AI
- Pally vs Poke
- Pally vs Tasker AI
- Poke vs Tomo
- Poke vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tasker AI vs Wajo (Fo)
- Atticus vs Poke
- Atticus vs Tasker AI
- Hark Pro vs Poke
- Hark Pro vs Tasker AI
- Poke vs Talorys
- Talorys vs Tasker AI
Disclosure
Tasker AI competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/poke-vs-tasker-ai.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/poke.json·/api/v1/tools/tasker-ai.json - From a terminal
anchor compare poke tasker-ai(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "poke", "b": "tasker-ai"}at/mcp, no key