Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run
IronClaw vs Poke
IronClaw scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against Poke's 37.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistant proactive.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
IronClaw B
Best for One technical owner who wants a self-hosted assistant over Gmail, Calendar, Slack and Telegram with credentials kept out of the model's reach.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 67 against 51
- Schema & documentation, 74 against 42
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 30
- Security & auth, 66 against 24
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 74 against 31
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 58
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
Global auto-approve defaults to on in the 1.4.1 source, so tools marked ask (send, trash, delete) run without a prompt. Only financial, approval and budget effects always ask
Poke F
Best for One person who wants an assistant in their text messages that reads and drafts mail, manages a calendar and reaches other apps through MCP.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No documented setting for which actions need approval before Poke sends, deletes or spends. Release notes mention email draft approval only in passing
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | IronClaw | Poke | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 67 | 51 | IronClaw +16 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 74 | 42 | IronClaw +32 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 30 | IronClaw +39 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 66 | 24 | IronClaw +42 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 30 | IronClaw +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 74 | 31 | IronClaw +43 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 75 | 58 | IronClaw +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | B 66.7/100 | F 37.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | IronClaw | Poke |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Platform |
| Vendor | NEAR AI | The Interaction Company of California Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | Proprietary service under Poke's Terms of Service. The poke npm package (CLI and Node.js SDK) declares MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-03-17 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-09-11 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 13k stars | none |
Verdicts
IronClaw
Credentials stay in an encrypted store and are injected at the host boundary, and extensions declare per-tool permissions, network targets and OAuth scopes. The global auto-approve setting defaults to on in the 1.4.1 source, so tools marked ask, such as gmail.send_message, run unprompted until the owner turns it off.
Poke
Hosted assistant that answers in Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram and RCS and acts in Gmail, Outlook, calendars and MCP servers. Plan prices and a status page are public. No approval settings, credential storage, model providers or retention periods are documented, and customer content trains models unless Maximum Privacy is selected.
Before you call either
IronClaw
- Open Settings and turn off global auto-approve, or set send and delete tools to ask each time, before connecting mail or chat accounts
- Install with the release installer and run
ironclaw onboard. 1.x does not migrate 0.29 data, so use a fresh home directory - Call
POST /api/v1/responseswith the bearer token from~/.ironclaw/reborn/webui-token. Keep under 30 requests in 60 seconds - Resolve approval and OAuth gates in the web interface. The Responses API fails the turn instead of surfacing them
- Connect MCP servers over HTTP only. The stdio transport is rejected
Poke
- POST JSON to
https://poke.com/api/v1/inbound/api-messagewith a Bearer key from Kitchen. Legacypk_keys work only on the deprecated/api/v1/inbound-sms/webhook - Expect only
{"success": true}back. Poke's answer goes to the owner's message thread, not to the caller - Do not retry a POST blindly. No idempotency key is documented, and a repeated message may make Poke act twice
- Treat an API key as full access to the owner's mail, calendar and integrations. Create one key per automation and revoke it when done
- Avoid the prefilled integration link with
apiKeyin the query string for real secrets. Enter the key in the form or usenpx poke@latest mcp add -k
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, IronClaw or Poke?
IronClaw scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against Poke's 37.6 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are IronClaw and Poke open source?
IronClaw is open source (MIT OR Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Poke.
Other comparisons with IronClaw or Poke
- AstrBot vs IronClaw
- AstrBot vs Poke
- CowAgent vs IronClaw
- CowAgent vs Poke
- GAIA vs IronClaw
- GAIA vs Poke
- Gemini Spark vs IronClaw
- Gemini Spark vs Poke
- Grok Bot vs IronClaw
- Grok Bot vs Poke
- Haven vs IronClaw
- Haven vs Poke
- Hermes Agent vs IronClaw
- Hermes Agent vs Poke
- Instinct vs IronClaw
- Instinct vs Poke
- IronClaw vs Leon
- IronClaw vs Lindy
- IronClaw vs nanobot
- IronClaw vs NanoClaw
- IronClaw vs Dots
- IronClaw vs OpenClaw
- IronClaw vs PicoClaw
- IronClaw vs QwenPaw
- IronClaw vs ZeroClaw
- IronClaw vs Zo Computer
- Leon vs Poke
- Lindy vs Poke
- nanobot vs Poke
- NanoClaw vs Poke
- Dots vs Poke
- OpenClaw vs Poke
- PicoClaw vs Poke
- Poke vs QwenPaw
- Poke vs ZeroClaw
- Poke vs Zo Computer
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ironclaw-vs-poke.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ironclaw.json·/api/v1/tools/poke.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ironclaw poke(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ironclaw", "b": "poke"}at/mcp, no key