Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
asaply vs Poke
Poke scores 37.6 (F) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
asaply F
Best for People in covered neighbourhoods who want coffee, lunch, tickets and rides handled by text.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Poke F
Best for One person who wants an assistant in their text messages that reads and drafts mail, manages a calendar and reaches other apps through MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 51 against 10
- Schema & documentation, 42 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 30 against 0
- Security & auth, 24 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 31 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 58 against 43
Watch for
No documented setting for which actions need approval before Poke sends, deletes or spends. Release notes mention email draft approval only in passing
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | asaply | Poke | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 10 | 51 | Poke +41 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 42 | Poke +32 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 30 | Poke +30 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 24 | Poke +24 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 30 | Poke +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 2 | 31 | Poke +29 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 43 | 58 | Poke +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 7.6/100 | F 37.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | asaply | Poke |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Asaply Inc. | The Interaction Company of California Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under asaply's Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Messaging Terms (Asaply Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 11 October 2026). | Proprietary service under Poke's Terms of Service. The poke npm package (CLI and Node.js SDK) declares MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-03-17 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-11 | |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |
Verdicts
asaply
asaply is a text-only errand assistant in early access that orders, books and pays through Apple Pay after showing the total, and can read and change a connected Google Calendar and Gmail. No outside agent can call it, the service fee isn't published, and no status page or security contact was found.
Poke
Hosted assistant that answers in Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram and RCS and acts in Gmail, Outlook, calendars and MCP servers. Plan prices and a status page are public. No approval settings, credential storage, model providers or retention periods are documented, and customer content trains models unless Maximum Privacy is selected.
Before you call either
asaply
- Don't plan to call asaply from another agent. It answers only texts from the owner's phone number and group chats it joins.
- Tell the owner each errand adds an unpublished service fee to the order total.
Poke
- POST JSON to
https://poke.com/api/v1/inbound/api-messagewith a Bearer key from Kitchen. Legacypk_keys work only on the deprecated/api/v1/inbound-sms/webhook - Expect only
{"success": true}back. Poke's answer goes to the owner's message thread, not to the caller - Do not retry a POST blindly. No idempotency key is documented, and a repeated message may make Poke act twice
- Treat an API key as full access to the owner's mail, calendar and integrations. Create one key per automation and revoke it when done
- Avoid the prefilled integration link with
apiKeyin the query string for real secrets. Enter the key in the form or usenpx poke@latest mcp add -k
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, asaply or Poke?
Poke scores 37.6 (F) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with asaply or Poke
- asaply vs Asmi
- asaply vs AstrBot
- asaply vs Boba
- asaply vs Boski
- asaply vs Brea
- asaply vs Caddy
- asaply vs CowAgent
- asaply vs Del
- asaply vs folk
- asaply vs GAIA
- asaply vs Grok Bot
- asaply vs Haven
- asaply vs Hermes Agent
- asaply vs HireAlpha
- asaply vs Instinct
- asaply vs IronClaw
- asaply vs Lindy
- asaply vs nanobot
- asaply vs NanoClaw
- asaply vs Natura tinyNature
- asaply vs Dots
- asaply vs OpenClaw
- asaply vs OpenInstinct
- asaply vs Orbits
- asaply vs Orchid
- asaply vs Pally
- asaply vs PicoClaw
- asaply vs QwenPaw
- asaply vs szn
- asaply vs Tab
- asaply vs Tomo
- asaply vs Town
- asaply vs Zapia
- asaply vs ZeroClaw
- asaply vs Zo Computer
- Asmi vs Poke
- Boba vs Poke
- Brea vs Poke
- Del vs Poke
- HireAlpha vs Poke
- OpenInstinct vs Poke
- Orbits vs Poke
- Orchid vs Poke
- Poke vs szn
- Poke vs Tab
- Poke vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Poke
- Boski vs Poke
- Caddy vs Poke
- CowAgent vs Poke
- folk vs Poke
- GAIA vs Poke
- Gemini Spark vs Poke
- Grok Bot vs Poke
- Haven vs Poke
- Hermes Agent vs Poke
- Instinct vs Poke
- IronClaw vs Poke
- Leon vs Poke
- Lindy vs Poke
- nanobot vs Poke
- NanoClaw vs Poke
- Dots vs Poke
- OpenClaw vs Poke
- PicoClaw vs Poke
- Poke vs QwenPaw
- Poke vs Town
- Poke vs ZeroClaw
- Poke vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Gemini Spark
- asaply vs Leon
- asaply vs Wajo (Fo)
- Natura tinyNature vs Poke
- Pally vs Poke
- Poke vs Tomo
- Poke vs Wajo (Fo)
- asaply vs Talorys
- Poke vs Talorys
Disclosure
asaply competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/asaply-vs-poke.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/asaply.json·/api/v1/tools/poke.json - From a terminal
anchor compare asaply poke(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "asaply", "b": "poke"}at/mcp, no key