Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
Asmi vs Poke
Poke scores 37.6 (F) on agent readiness against Asmi's 33.3 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Asmi leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Asmi F
Best for An agent that needs phone calls, texts and emails to businesses done for its owner.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 43 against 30
- Security & auth, 49 against 24
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Tool JSON Schemas and annotations can't be read before OAuth (unauthenticated initialize returns 401).
Poke F
Best for One person who wants an assistant in their text messages that reads and drafts mail, manages a calendar and reaches other apps through MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 51 against 30
- Schema & documentation, 42 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 31 against 3
- Transparency & trust, 58 against 51
Watch for
No documented setting for which actions need approval before Poke sends, deletes or spends. Release notes mention email draft approval only in passing
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Asmi | Poke | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 30 | 51 | Poke +21 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 20 | 42 | Poke +22 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 43 | 30 | Asmi +13 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 49 | 24 | Asmi +25 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 3 | 31 | Poke +28 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 58 | Poke +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 33.3/100 | F 37.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Asmi | Poke |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Humint Labs, Inc. | The Interaction Company of California Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://prod.asmiai.com/mcp/claude/ | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Asmi's Terms of Service (Humint Labs, Inc., a Delaware corporation, effective October 2026). | Proprietary service under Poke's Terms of Service. The poke npm package (CLI and Node.js SDK) declares MIT |
| Tools exposed | 12 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-03-17 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-11 | |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |
Verdicts
Asmi
Asmi is a hosted errand service with a 12-tool MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Muse, using OAuth with separate scopes for tracking tasks and for contacting people. Tool schemas sit behind sign-in, the outreach scope is ticked by default, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found.
Poke
Hosted assistant that answers in Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram and RCS and acts in Gmail, Outlook, calendars and MCP servers. Plan prices and a status page are public. No approval settings, credential storage, model providers or retention periods are documented, and customer content trains models unless Maximum Privacy is selected.
Before you call either
Asmi
- Use the endpoint for your own client (/mcp/claude/, /mcp/openai/ or /mcp/meta/). A token from another client gets 403.
- Call discover_search before execute_start, then poll execute_status with the task id instead of starting the task again.
- Answer Asmi's questions with execute_advance. Calls already placed can't be recalled by execute_cancel.
- Expect outreach_not_permitted if the owner unticked contact people. Ask them to reconnect rather than retrying.
- Check billing_status before starting a task, since each outreach task uses one of the month's quota.
Poke
- POST JSON to
https://poke.com/api/v1/inbound/api-messagewith a Bearer key from Kitchen. Legacypk_keys work only on the deprecated/api/v1/inbound-sms/webhook - Expect only
{"success": true}back. Poke's answer goes to the owner's message thread, not to the caller - Do not retry a POST blindly. No idempotency key is documented, and a repeated message may make Poke act twice
- Treat an API key as full access to the owner's mail, calendar and integrations. Create one key per automation and revoke it when done
- Avoid the prefilled integration link with
apiKeyin the query string for real secrets. Enter the key in the form or usenpx poke@latest mcp add -k
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Asmi or Poke?
Poke scores 37.6 (F) on agent readiness against Asmi's 33.3 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Asmi leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth.
Other comparisons with Asmi or Poke
- asaply vs Asmi
- asaply vs Poke
- Asmi vs AstrBot
- Asmi vs Boba
- Asmi vs Boski
- Asmi vs Brea
- Asmi vs Caddy
- Asmi vs CowAgent
- Asmi vs Del
- Asmi vs folk
- Asmi vs GAIA
- Asmi vs Grok Bot
- Asmi vs Haven
- Asmi vs Hermes Agent
- Asmi vs HireAlpha
- Asmi vs Instinct
- Asmi vs IronClaw
- Asmi vs Lindy
- Asmi vs nanobot
- Asmi vs NanoClaw
- Asmi vs Natura tinyNature
- Asmi vs Dots
- Asmi vs OpenClaw
- Asmi vs OpenInstinct
- Asmi vs Orbits
- Asmi vs Orchid
- Asmi vs Pally
- Asmi vs PicoClaw
- Asmi vs QwenPaw
- Asmi vs szn
- Asmi vs Tab
- Asmi vs Tomo
- Asmi vs Town
- Asmi vs Zapia
- Asmi vs ZeroClaw
- Asmi vs Zo Computer
- Boba vs Poke
- Brea vs Poke
- Del vs Poke
- HireAlpha vs Poke
- OpenInstinct vs Poke
- Orbits vs Poke
- Orchid vs Poke
- Poke vs szn
- Poke vs Tab
- Poke vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Poke
- Boski vs Poke
- Caddy vs Poke
- CowAgent vs Poke
- folk vs Poke
- GAIA vs Poke
- Gemini Spark vs Poke
- Grok Bot vs Poke
- Haven vs Poke
- Hermes Agent vs Poke
- Instinct vs Poke
- IronClaw vs Poke
- Leon vs Poke
- Lindy vs Poke
- nanobot vs Poke
- NanoClaw vs Poke
- Dots vs Poke
- OpenClaw vs Poke
- PicoClaw vs Poke
- Poke vs QwenPaw
- Poke vs Town
- Poke vs ZeroClaw
- Poke vs Zo Computer
- Natura tinyNature vs Poke
- Pally vs Poke
- Poke vs Tomo
- Poke vs Wajo (Fo)
- Asmi vs Gemini Spark
- Asmi vs Leon
- Asmi vs Talorys
- Asmi vs Wajo (Fo)
- Poke vs Talorys
Disclosure
Asmi competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/asmi-vs-poke.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/asmi.json·/api/v1/tools/poke.json - From a terminal
anchor compare asmi poke(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "asmi", "b": "poke"}at/mcp, no key