Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run

asaply vs Asmi

Asmi scores 33.3 (F) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants reached by message.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

asaplyAsaply Inc. · Platform F7.6/100#1006 of 1010 AsmiHumint Labs, Inc. · Platform F33.3/100#973 of 1010

Which one, for what

asaply F

Best for People in covered neighbourhoods who want coffee, lunch, tickets and rides handled by text.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Asmi F

Best for An agent that needs phone calls, texts and emails to businesses done for its owner.

Ahead on

Reliability, 30 against 10
Schema & documentation, 20 against 10
Agent ergonomics, 43 against 0
Security & auth, 49 against 0
Payments & pricing, 30 against 0
Transparency & trust, 51 against 43

Also in its favour

A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Tool JSON Schemas and annotations can't be read before OAuth (unauthenticated initialize returns 401).

Score by category

Category	Weight this run	asaply	Asmi	Edge
Reliability	16%20	10	30	Asmi +20
Performance	10%pending	pending	pending	not scored in this run
Schema & documentation	13%16.2	10	20	Asmi +10
Agent ergonomics	13%16.2	0	43	Asmi +43
Security & auth	14%17.5	0	49	Asmi +49
Payments & pricing	10%12.5	0	30	Asmi +30
Task success	10%pending	pending	pending	not scored in this run
Maintenance & community	7%8.8	2	3	Asmi +1
Transparency & trust	7%8.8	43	51	Asmi +8
Negative events	≤15	0	0
Total		F 7.6/100	F 33.3/100

Facts side by side

Fact	asaply	Asmi
Kind	Platform	Platform
Vendor	Asaply Inc.	Humint Labs, Inc.
Hosted endpoint	no (local only)	`https://prod.asmiai.com/mcp/claude/`
Transports		Streamable HTTP
Auth	OAuth or key	OAuth
Pricing	Pay per use	Freemium
x402	no	no
Licence	Closed service under asaply's Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Messaging Terms (Asaply Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 11 October 2026).	Closed service under Asmi's Terms of Service (Humint Labs, Inc., a Delaware corporation, effective October 2026).
Tools exposed	none	12
Read-only variant documented	no	no
llms.txt	yes	no
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updated
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver

Verdicts

asaply

asaply is a text-only errand assistant in early access that orders, books and pays through Apple Pay after showing the total, and can read and change a connected Google Calendar and Gmail. No outside agent can call it, the service fee isn't published, and no status page or security contact was found.

Asmi

Asmi is a hosted errand service with a 12-tool MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Muse, using OAuth with separate scopes for tracking tasks and for contacting people. Tool schemas sit behind sign-in, the outreach scope is ticked by default, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found.

Before you call either

asaply

Don't plan to call asaply from another agent. It answers only texts from the owner's phone number and group chats it joins.
Tell the owner each errand adds an unpublished service fee to the order total.

Asmi

Use the endpoint for your own client (/mcp/claude/, /mcp/openai/ or /mcp/meta/). A token from another client gets 403.
Call discover_search before execute_start, then poll execute_status with the task id instead of starting the task again.
Answer Asmi's questions with execute_advance. Calls already placed can't be recalled by execute_cancel.
Expect outreach_not_permitted if the owner unticked contact people. Ask them to reconnect rather than retrying.
Check billing_status before starting a task, since each outreach task uses one of the month's quota.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, asaply or Asmi?

Asmi scores 33.3 (F) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category.

Other comparisons with asaply or Asmi

Disclosure

asaply competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Asmi competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

This page as Markdown /compare/asaply-vs-asmi.md · slim .min.md · JSON .json (or send Accept: text/markdown)
Each listing in full /api/v1/tools/asaply.json · /api/v1/tools/asmi.json
From a terminal anchor compare asaply asmi (the CLI)
Over MCP compare_tools {"a": "asaply", "b": "asmi"} at /mcp, no key

Which one, for what

Score by category

Facts side by side

Verdicts

asaply

Asmi

Before you call either

asaply

Asmi

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, asaply or Asmi?

Other comparisons with asaply or Asmi

Disclosure

Machine-readable

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?