Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
asaply vs Haven
Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. asaply leads on schema & documentation. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
asaply F
Best for People in covered neighbourhoods who want coffee, lunch, tickets and rides handled by text.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 10 against 4
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Haven F
Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 6 against 0
- Security & auth, 13 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 35 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 51 against 43
Watch for
No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | asaply | Haven | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 10 | 35 | Haven +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 4 | asaply +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 6 | Haven +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 13 | Haven +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 30 | Haven +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 2 | 35 | Haven +33 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 43 | 51 | Haven +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 7.6/100 | F 22.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | asaply | Haven |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Asaply Inc. | Hello Haven, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under asaply's Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Messaging Terms (Asaply Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 11 October 2026). | Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-17 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |
Verdicts
asaply
asaply is a text-only errand assistant in early access that orders, books and pays through Apple Pay after showing the total, and can read and change a connected Google Calendar and Gmail. No outside agent can call it, the service fee isn't published, and no status page or security contact was found.
Haven
Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.
Before you call either
asaply
- Don't plan to call asaply from another agent. It answers only texts from the owner's phone number and group chats it joins.
- Tell the owner each errand adds an unpublished service fee to the order total.
Haven
- Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
- Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
- Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
- Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
- Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, asaply or Haven?
Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. asaply leads on schema & documentation.
Other comparisons with asaply or Haven
- asaply vs Asmi
- asaply vs AstrBot
- asaply vs Boba
- asaply vs Boski
- asaply vs Brea
- asaply vs Caddy
- asaply vs CowAgent
- asaply vs Del
- asaply vs folk
- asaply vs GAIA
- asaply vs Grok Bot
- asaply vs Hermes Agent
- asaply vs HireAlpha
- asaply vs Instinct
- asaply vs IronClaw
- asaply vs Lindy
- asaply vs nanobot
- asaply vs NanoClaw
- asaply vs Natura tinyNature
- asaply vs Dots
- asaply vs OpenClaw
- asaply vs OpenInstinct
- asaply vs Orbits
- asaply vs Orchid
- asaply vs Pally
- asaply vs PicoClaw
- asaply vs Poke
- asaply vs QwenPaw
- asaply vs szn
- asaply vs Tab
- asaply vs Tomo
- asaply vs Town
- asaply vs Zapia
- asaply vs ZeroClaw
- asaply vs Zo Computer
- Asmi vs Haven
- Boba vs Haven
- Brea vs Haven
- Del vs Haven
- Haven vs HireAlpha
- Haven vs OpenInstinct
- Haven vs Orbits
- Haven vs Orchid
- Haven vs szn
- Haven vs Tab
- Haven vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Haven
- Boski vs Haven
- Caddy vs Haven
- CowAgent vs Haven
- folk vs Haven
- GAIA vs Haven
- Gemini Spark vs Haven
- Grok Bot vs Haven
- Haven vs Hermes Agent
- Haven vs Instinct
- Haven vs IronClaw
- Haven vs Leon
- Haven vs Lindy
- Haven vs nanobot
- Haven vs NanoClaw
- Haven vs Dots
- Haven vs OpenClaw
- Haven vs PicoClaw
- Haven vs Poke
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs Town
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Haven vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Gemini Spark
- asaply vs Leon
- asaply vs Wajo (Fo)
- Haven vs Natura tinyNature
- Haven vs Pally
- Haven vs Tomo
- Haven vs Wajo (Fo)
- asaply vs Talorys
- Haven vs Talorys
Disclosure
asaply competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/asaply-vs-haven.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/asaply.json·/api/v1/tools/haven.json - From a terminal
anchor compare asaply haven(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "asaply", "b": "haven"}at/mcp, no key