Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run

folk vs Haven

Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against folk's 19.8 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. folk leads on schema & documentation and transparency & trust. Both do proactive personal assistants.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

folk F

Best for People who want a texting companion for habits, workouts, study and money goals, with a free tier.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 10 against 4
  • Transparency & trust, 67 against 51

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Haven F

Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 35 against 25
  • Agent ergonomics, 6 against 0
  • Security & auth, 13 against 3

Watch for

No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runfolkHavenEdge
Reliability16%202535Haven +10
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2104folk +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.206Haven +6
Security & auth14%17.5313Haven +10
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.83535even
Transparency & trust7%8.86751folk +16
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 19.8/100F 22.2/100

Facts side by side

FactfolkHaven
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorNozomio, Inc.Hello Haven, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under folk's terms (Nozomio, Inc., last updated 8 September 2026).Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-122026-09-17
Terms last updated2026-07-24
Privacy policy last updated2026-07-24
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text

Verdicts

folk

folk is a texting accountability assistant with its own cloud computer, a free tier with no card and a privacy policy that rules out training on user data. No outside agent can call it, no status page or changelog was found, and its llms.txt and pricing file disagree on free limits and Max's price.

Haven

Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.

Before you call either

folk

  1. Don't plan to call folk from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, Telegram or WhatsApp thread and iPhone app.
  2. Quote limits and prices from pricing.md and the terms, and note that llms.txt gives different free-tier limits.

Haven

  1. Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
  2. Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
  3. Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
  4. Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
  5. Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, folk or Haven?

Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against folk's 19.8 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. folk leads on schema & documentation and transparency & trust.

Other comparisons with folk or Haven

Disclosure

folk competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.