Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run

Brea vs Haven

Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against Brea's 12.9 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Brea leads on schema & documentation. Both do assistants reached by message.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Brea F

Best for An iPhone user who wants an assistant across many apps and websites with per-action approval.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 10 against 4

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Haven F

Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 35 against 15
  • Agent ergonomics, 6 against 0
  • Security & auth, 13 against 7
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 35 against 4

Watch for

No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runBreaHavenEdge
Reliability16%201535Haven +20
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2104Brea +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.206Haven +6
Security & auth14%17.5713Haven +6
Payments & pricing10%12.52030Haven +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8435Haven +31
Transparency & trust7%8.84851Haven +3
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 12.9/100F 22.2/100

Facts side by side

FactBreaHaven
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorBrea AI LLCHello Haven, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Brea's terms (Brea AI LLC, last updated 2 July 2026).Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last releasenone2026-09-17
Terms last updated2026-07-24
Privacy policy last updated2026-07-24
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text

Verdicts

Brea

Brea is an iMessage assistant with a free plan that needs no card, approval by reply before it sends, deletes or pays, and one-time Link cards for purchases. No outside agent can call it, paid prices sit inside the app, and no changelog or subprocessor list was found.

Haven

Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.

Before you call either

Brea

  1. Don't plan to call Brea from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage thread.
  2. Tell the owner that replying ALWAYS stops Brea asking again for that action.

Haven

  1. Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
  2. Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
  3. Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
  4. Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
  5. Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Brea or Haven?

Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against Brea's 12.9 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Brea leads on schema & documentation.

Other comparisons with Brea or Haven

Disclosure

Brea competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.