Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run
Haven vs Dots
Dots scores 28.3 (F) on agent readiness against Haven's 22.2 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Haven leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do assistant proactive.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Haven F
Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 3
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
- Transparency & trust, 51 against 31
Watch for
No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.
Dots F
Best for A ChatGPT Pro or Enterprise user who wants ongoing work tracked across mail, documents, code and Slack with approval before sends.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 41 against 4
- Agent ergonomics, 22 against 6
- Security & auth, 58 against 13
Watch for
Beta. The admin setting is labelled Use dots (Beta), access is rolling out gradually, and Teams access is an invite-only alpha
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Haven | Dots | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 3 | Haven +32 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 4 | 41 | Dots +37 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 6 | 22 | Dots +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 13 | 58 | Dots +45 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 10 | Haven +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 35 | 38 | Dots +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 31 | Haven +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 22.2/100 | F 28.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Haven | Dots |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Hello Haven, Inc. | OpenAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service | Proprietary hosted service. The governing terms were not read |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-24 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-24 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |
Verdicts
Haven
Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.
Dots
Actions that affect accounts or share information pass an automatic review, and custom rules can require approval or a hand-off. Dots is a beta on Pro plans from $100 a month, and no status page, terms, privacy policy or way to delete individual saved notes was found in the pages we could read.
Before you call either
Haven
- Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
- Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
- Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
- Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
- Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.
Dots
- Say what may be sent. Asking a dot to draft replies does not permit sending them, and an action outside a stated scope needs another decision
- Stop three things separately. Pause stops the main task only, delegated tasks stop in Activity and recurring tasks in Scheduled, and completed actions are not undone
- Connect each thing separately. A messaging channel grants no access to an inbox, an app or a computer
- Sign out of websites and disconnect apps yourself when removing access. Revoking dots access or disconnecting an app does not delete information already obtained
- Keep the connected computer online with the ChatGPT app open for local work. Only one personal computer can be connected at a time
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Haven or Dots?
Dots scores 28.3 (F) on agent readiness against Haven's 22.2 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Haven leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Other comparisons with Haven or Dots
- AstrBot vs Haven
- AstrBot vs Dots
- CowAgent vs Haven
- CowAgent vs Dots
- GAIA vs Haven
- GAIA vs Dots
- Gemini Spark vs Haven
- Gemini Spark vs Dots
- Grok Bot vs Haven
- Grok Bot vs Dots
- Haven vs Hermes Agent
- Haven vs Instinct
- Haven vs IronClaw
- Haven vs Leon
- Haven vs Lindy
- Haven vs nanobot
- Haven vs NanoClaw
- Haven vs OpenClaw
- Haven vs PicoClaw
- Haven vs Poke
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Haven vs Zo Computer
- Hermes Agent vs Dots
- Instinct vs Dots
- IronClaw vs Dots
- Leon vs Dots
- Lindy vs Dots
- nanobot vs Dots
- NanoClaw vs Dots
- Dots vs OpenClaw
- Dots vs PicoClaw
- Dots vs Poke
- Dots vs QwenPaw
- Dots vs ZeroClaw
- Dots vs Zo Computer
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/haven-vs-openai-dots.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/haven.json·/api/v1/tools/openai-dots.json - From a terminal
anchor compare haven openai-dots(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "haven", "b": "openai-dots"}at/mcp, no key