# Haven vs Dots (slim)

> Dots scores 28.3 (F) to Haven's 22.2 (F) for assistant proactive. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/haven-vs-openai-dots.md (~2,500 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/haven-vs-openai-dots.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/haven-vs-openai-dots
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-12

Dots scores 28.3 (F) on agent readiness against Haven's 22.2 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Haven leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do assistant proactive.

- Haven: F 22.2, rank #977 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/haven.min.md
- Dots: F 28.3, rank #973 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openai-dots.min.md
- Haven, good for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them. Ahead on Reliability, 35 against 3; Payments & pricing, 30 against 10; Transparency & trust, 51 against 31.
- Dots, good for A ChatGPT Pro or Enterprise user who wants ongoing work tracked across mail, documents, code and Slack with approval before sends. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 41 against 4; Agent ergonomics, 22 against 6; Security & auth, 58 against 13.

| Category | Haven | Dots |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 35 | 3 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 4 | 41 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 6 | 22 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 13 | 58 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 10 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 35 | 38 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 51 | 31 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Haven | Dots |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Hello Haven, Inc. | OpenAI |
| Transports | HTTP |  |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service | Proprietary hosted service. The governing terms were not read |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-24 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-24 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |