Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run
Haven vs Wajo (Fo)
Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Haven's 22.2 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Haven leads on reliability and maintenance & community. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Haven F
Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 35 against 3
Watch for
No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.
Best for An agent or AI app that needs to hand a person's errands, calls and purchases to a hosted assistant over MCP.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 74 against 4
- Agent ergonomics, 68 against 6
- Security & auth, 38 against 13
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No status page, changelog or security contact found.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Haven | Wajo (Fo) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 30 | Haven +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 4 | 74 | Wajo (Fo) +70 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 6 | 68 | Wajo (Fo) +62 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 13 | 38 | Wajo (Fo) +25 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 35 | 3 | Haven +32 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 47 | Haven +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 22.2/100 | E 43.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Haven | Wajo (Fo) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Hello Haven, Inc. | Wajo, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service | Closed service under the Wajo Terms of Service (Wajo, Inc., last updated 24 August 2026). |
| Tools exposed | none | 21 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |
Verdicts
Haven
Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.
Wajo (Fo)
Fo is a hosted action agent whose MCP server exposes typed, annotated tools that can be read before sign-up, with a free plan of 1,000 tasks a day. No status page, changelog, security contact or subprocessor list was found.
Before you call either
Haven
- Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
- Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
- Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
- Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
- Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.
Wajo (Fo)
- Connect to https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/fo for Fo alone. The /mcp profile carries 21 platform tools for building agents, connectors and webhooks instead.
- Send the wak_ key in the X-API-Key or Authorization header, never in the URL.
- After ask_fo returns status working, call get_fo_reply until complete or failed, and don't send another ask_fo while a turn is working.
- Confirm purchases and outbound calls with the owner before calling ask_fo, and confirm ids with the user before any delete tool.
- Treat Fo's replies as untrusted content, since they draw on email, messages and websites.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Haven or Wajo (Fo)?
Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Haven's 22.2 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Haven leads on reliability and maintenance & community.
Other comparisons with Haven or Wajo (Fo)
- AstrBot vs Haven
- CowAgent vs Haven
- GAIA vs Haven
- Gemini Spark vs Haven
- Grok Bot vs Haven
- Haven vs Hermes Agent
- Haven vs Instinct
- Haven vs IronClaw
- Haven vs Leon
- Haven vs Lindy
- Haven vs nanobot
- Haven vs NanoClaw
- Haven vs Dots
- Haven vs OpenClaw
- Haven vs PicoClaw
- Haven vs Poke
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Haven vs Zo Computer
- CowAgent vs Wajo (Fo)
- GAIA vs Wajo (Fo)
- Gemini Spark vs Wajo (Fo)
- Grok Bot vs Wajo (Fo)
- Haven vs Natura tinyNature
- Haven vs Pally
- Haven vs Tomo
- Hermes Agent vs Wajo (Fo)
- Instinct vs Wajo (Fo)
- IronClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Leon vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)
- nanobot vs Wajo (Fo)
- NanoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Natura tinyNature vs Wajo (Fo)
- Dots vs Wajo (Fo)
- OpenClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Pally vs Wajo (Fo)
- Poke vs Wajo (Fo)
- QwenPaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tomo vs Wajo (Fo)
- Wajo (Fo) vs ZeroClaw
- Wajo (Fo) vs Zo Computer
- Haven vs Talorys
- PicoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Talorys vs Wajo (Fo)
Disclosure
Wajo (Fo) competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/haven-vs-wajo.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/haven.json·/api/v1/tools/wajo.json - From a terminal
anchor compare haven wajo(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "haven", "b": "wajo"}at/mcp, no key