Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
Del vs Haven
Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against Del's 20.6 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Del leads on schema & documentation, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Del F
Best for People who want tasks, notes, reminders and Gmail handled by text on the channel they already use.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 10 against 4
- Maintenance & community, 60 against 35
- Transparency & trust, 57 against 51
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Haven F
Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 25
- Agent ergonomics, 6 against 0
- Security & auth, 13 against 0
Watch for
No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Del | Haven | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 25 | 35 | Haven +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 4 | Del +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 6 | Haven +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 13 | Haven +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 35 | Del +25 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 57 | 51 | Del +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 20.6/100 | F 22.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Del | Haven |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Human Interface, Inc. | Hello Haven, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Del's Terms of Service (Human Interface, Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 5 August 2026). | Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-09-17 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |
Verdicts
Del
Del is a hosted texting assistant and task workspace across iMessage, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS, Discord and Slack, with a near-daily public changelog and a card-free 14-day trial. No outside agent can call it, no status page or security contact was found, and recent updates let some email actions skip approval.
Haven
Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.
Before you call either
Del
- Don't plan to call Del from another agent. It answers only the owner's messaging threads and web workspace.
- Tell the owner web browsing tasks are limited to five a month on Standard and unlimited on Pro.
Haven
- Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
- Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
- Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
- Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
- Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Del or Haven?
Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against Del's 20.6 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Del leads on schema & documentation, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Other comparisons with Del or Haven
- asaply vs Del
- asaply vs Haven
- Asmi vs Del
- Asmi vs Haven
- AstrBot vs Del
- Boba vs Del
- Boba vs Haven
- Boski vs Del
- Brea vs Del
- Brea vs Haven
- Caddy vs Del
- CowAgent vs Del
- Del vs folk
- Del vs GAIA
- Del vs Grok Bot
- Del vs Hermes Agent
- Del vs HireAlpha
- Del vs Instinct
- Del vs IronClaw
- Del vs Lindy
- Del vs nanobot
- Del vs NanoClaw
- Del vs Natura tinyNature
- Del vs Dots
- Del vs OpenClaw
- Del vs OpenInstinct
- Del vs Orbits
- Del vs Orchid
- Del vs Pally
- Del vs PicoClaw
- Del vs Poke
- Del vs QwenPaw
- Del vs szn
- Del vs Tab
- Del vs Tomo
- Del vs Town
- Del vs Zapia
- Del vs ZeroClaw
- Del vs Zo Computer
- Haven vs HireAlpha
- Haven vs OpenInstinct
- Haven vs Orbits
- Haven vs Orchid
- Haven vs szn
- Haven vs Tab
- Haven vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Haven
- Boski vs Haven
- Caddy vs Haven
- CowAgent vs Haven
- folk vs Haven
- GAIA vs Haven
- Gemini Spark vs Haven
- Grok Bot vs Haven
- Haven vs Hermes Agent
- Haven vs Instinct
- Haven vs IronClaw
- Haven vs Leon
- Haven vs Lindy
- Haven vs nanobot
- Haven vs NanoClaw
- Haven vs Dots
- Haven vs OpenClaw
- Haven vs PicoClaw
- Haven vs Poke
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs Town
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Haven vs Zo Computer
- Del vs Gemini Spark
- Del vs Leon
- Del vs Wajo (Fo)
- Haven vs Natura tinyNature
- Haven vs Pally
- Haven vs Tomo
- Haven vs Wajo (Fo)
- Del vs Talorys
- Haven vs Talorys
Disclosure
Del competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/del-vs-haven.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/del.json·/api/v1/tools/haven.json - From a terminal
anchor compare del haven(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "del", "b": "haven"}at/mcp, no key