Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Del vs Hark Pro
Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Del's 20.6 (F), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Del leads on reliability, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 917 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Del F
Best for People who want tasks, notes, reminders and Gmail handled by text on the channel they already use.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 25 against 15
- Maintenance & community, 60 against 0
- Transparency & trust, 57 against 42
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Hark Pro F
Best for Hark Pro is a personal assistant for web, iOS and Android.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 10 against 0
- Security & auth, 45 against 0
Watch for
External API and MCP access were not verified
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Del | Hark Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 25 | 15 | Del +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 10 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 10 | Hark Pro +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 45 | Hark Pro +45 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 0 | Del +60 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 57 | 42 | Del +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 20.6/100 | F 21.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Del | Hark Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Human Interface, Inc. | Hark Labs, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Del's Terms of Service (Human Interface, Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 5 August 2026). | Proprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Del
Del is a hosted texting assistant and task workspace across iMessage, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS, Discord and Slack, with a near-daily public changelog and a card-free 14-day trial. No outside agent can call it, no status page or security contact was found, and recent updates let some email actions skip approval.
Hark Pro
Free tier includes the assistant capabilities. External API and MCP access were not verified.
Before you call either
Del
- Don't plan to call Del from another agent. It answers only the owner's messaging threads and web workspace.
- Tell the owner web browsing tasks are limited to five a month on Standard and unlimited on Pro.
Hark Pro
- Hand onboarding to the person using the Hark app.
- Do not treat Hark Services integrations as an API for calling Hark.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Del or Hark Pro?
Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Del's 20.6 (F), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Del leads on reliability, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Other comparisons with Del or Hark Pro
- asaply vs Del
- Asmi vs Del
- AstrBot vs Del
- Boba vs Del
- Boski vs Del
- Brea vs Del
- Caddy vs Del
- CowAgent vs Del
- Del vs folk
- Del vs GAIA
- Del vs Grok Bot
- Del vs Haven
- Del vs Hermes Agent
- Del vs HireAlpha
- Del vs Instinct
- Del vs IronClaw
- Del vs Lindy
- Del vs nanobot
- Del vs NanoClaw
- Del vs Natura tinyNature
- Del vs Dots
- Del vs OpenClaw
- Del vs OpenInstinct
- Del vs Orbits
- Del vs Orchid
- Del vs Pally
- Del vs PicoClaw
- Del vs Poke
- Del vs QwenPaw
- Del vs szn
- Del vs Tab
- Del vs Tomo
- Del vs Town
- Del vs Zapia
- Del vs ZeroClaw
- Del vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Hark Pro
- Asmi vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Del
- Atticus vs Hark Pro
- Boba vs Hark Pro
- Boski vs Hark Pro
- Brea vs Hark Pro
- Caddy vs Hark Pro
- CowAgent vs Hark Pro
- Del vs Talorys
- folk vs Hark Pro
- GAIA vs Hark Pro
- Gemini Spark vs Hark Pro
- Grok Bot vs Hark Pro
- Hark Pro vs Haven
- Hark Pro vs Hermes Agent
- Hark Pro vs HireAlpha
- Hark Pro vs Instinct
- Hark Pro vs IronClaw
- Hark Pro vs Leon
- Hark Pro vs Lindy
- Hark Pro vs nanobot
- Hark Pro vs NanoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Natura tinyNature
- Hark Pro vs Dots
- Hark Pro vs OpenClaw
- Hark Pro vs OpenInstinct
- Hark Pro vs Orbits
- Hark Pro vs Orchid
- Hark Pro vs Pally
- Hark Pro vs PicoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Poke
- Hark Pro vs QwenPaw
- Hark Pro vs szn
- Hark Pro vs Tab
- Hark Pro vs Talorys
- Hark Pro vs Tomo
- Hark Pro vs Town
- Hark Pro vs Wajo (Fo)
- Hark Pro vs Zapia
- Hark Pro vs ZeroClaw
- Hark Pro vs Zo Computer
- Del vs Gemini Spark
- Del vs Leon
- Del vs Wajo (Fo)
Disclosure
Del competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/del-vs-hark-pro.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/del.json·/api/v1/tools/hark-pro.json - From a terminal
anchor compare del hark-pro(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "del", "b": "hark-pro"}at/mcp, no key