Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Atticus vs Hark Pro
Atticus scores 42.9 (E) on agent readiness against Hark Pro's 21.6 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 917 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Atticus E
Best for A person on macOS 26 with a Claude Pro or Max plan who wants voice control of apps, windows, files and the browser.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 15 against 10
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 51 against 0
- Transparency & trust, 56 against 42
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
No API, MCP server or documented command an outside agent can call
Hark Pro F
Best for Hark Pro is a personal assistant for web, iOS and Android.
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.0 against 1.0 out of 5
Watch for
External API and MCP access were not verified
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Atticus | Hark Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 15 | Atticus +53 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 15 | 10 | Atticus +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 9 | 10 | Hark Pro +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 49 | 45 | Atticus +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 30 | Atticus +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 51 | 0 | Atticus +51 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 42 | Atticus +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 42.9/100 | F 21.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Atticus | Hark Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | SaarthurR (Saarth Ranka) | Hark Labs, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Your plan | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | none |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 163 stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 1/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Atticus
Atticus runs a person's Mac by voice on their existing Claude or Devin plan, with a sandboxed safe mode and a local log of every command. It has no API, MCP server or documented command for another agent, it is five days old, and it rebuilds itself from the main branch every six hours by default.
Hark Pro
Free tier includes the assistant capabilities. External API and MCP access were not verified.
Before you call either
Atticus
- Don't plan to call Atticus from another agent. It takes requests only from its own shortcut and typing box
- If a user runs Atticus beside you, expect it to move windows and type into apps on the same Mac
- Point a user who wants pinned versions to Settings > About & Updates to turn off self-update
Hark Pro
- Hand onboarding to the person using the Hark app.
- Do not treat Hark Services integrations as an API for calling Hark.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Atticus or Hark Pro?
Atticus scores 42.9 (E) on agent readiness against Hark Pro's 21.6 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are Atticus and Hark Pro open source?
Atticus is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Hark Pro.
Other comparisons with Atticus or Hark Pro
- asaply vs Atticus
- asaply vs Hark Pro
- Asmi vs Atticus
- Asmi vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Boba
- Atticus vs Boski
- Atticus vs Brea
- Atticus vs Caddy
- Atticus vs CowAgent
- Atticus vs Del
- Atticus vs folk
- Atticus vs GAIA
- Atticus vs Gemini Spark
- Atticus vs Grok Bot
- Atticus vs Haven
- Atticus vs Hermes Agent
- Atticus vs HireAlpha
- Atticus vs Instinct
- Atticus vs IronClaw
- Atticus vs Leon
- Atticus vs Lindy
- Atticus vs nanobot
- Atticus vs NanoClaw
- Atticus vs Natura tinyNature
- Atticus vs Dots
- Atticus vs OpenClaw
- Atticus vs OpenInstinct
- Atticus vs Orbits
- Atticus vs Orchid
- Atticus vs Pally
- Atticus vs PicoClaw
- Atticus vs Poke
- Atticus vs QwenPaw
- Atticus vs szn
- Atticus vs Tab
- Atticus vs Talorys
- Atticus vs Tomo
- Atticus vs Town
- Atticus vs Wajo (Fo)
- Atticus vs Zapia
- Atticus vs ZeroClaw
- Atticus vs Zo Computer
- Boba vs Hark Pro
- Boski vs Hark Pro
- Brea vs Hark Pro
- Caddy vs Hark Pro
- CowAgent vs Hark Pro
- Del vs Hark Pro
- folk vs Hark Pro
- GAIA vs Hark Pro
- Gemini Spark vs Hark Pro
- Grok Bot vs Hark Pro
- Hark Pro vs Haven
- Hark Pro vs Hermes Agent
- Hark Pro vs HireAlpha
- Hark Pro vs Instinct
- Hark Pro vs IronClaw
- Hark Pro vs Leon
- Hark Pro vs Lindy
- Hark Pro vs nanobot
- Hark Pro vs NanoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Natura tinyNature
- Hark Pro vs Dots
- Hark Pro vs OpenClaw
- Hark Pro vs OpenInstinct
- Hark Pro vs Orbits
- Hark Pro vs Orchid
- Hark Pro vs Pally
- Hark Pro vs PicoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Poke
- Hark Pro vs QwenPaw
- Hark Pro vs szn
- Hark Pro vs Tab
- Hark Pro vs Talorys
- Hark Pro vs Tomo
- Hark Pro vs Town
- Hark Pro vs Wajo (Fo)
- Hark Pro vs Zapia
- Hark Pro vs ZeroClaw
- Hark Pro vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs Atticus
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/atticus-vs-hark-pro.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/atticus.json·/api/v1/tools/hark-pro.json - From a terminal
anchor compare atticus hark-pro(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "atticus", "b": "hark-pro"}at/mcp, no key