Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Hark Pro vs Tomo
Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Tomo leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 917 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Hark Pro F
Best for Hark Pro is a personal assistant for web, iOS and Android.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 10 against 0
- Agent ergonomics, 10 against 0
- Security & auth, 45 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
Watch for
External API and MCP access were not verified
Tomo F
Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 54 against 0
- Transparency & trust, 47 against 42
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hark Pro | Tomo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 15 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 0 | Hark Pro +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 10 | 0 | Hark Pro +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 45 | 0 | Hark Pro +45 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 10 | Hark Pro +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 0 | 54 | Tomo +54 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 42 | 47 | Tomo +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 21.6/100 | F 13.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hark Pro | Tomo |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Hark Labs, Inc. | Mapo Labs, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below. | Closed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026). |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-29 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | 1.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Hark Pro
Free tier includes the assistant capabilities. External API and MCP access were not verified.
Tomo
Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.
Before you call either
Hark Pro
- Hand onboarding to the person using the Hark app.
- Do not treat Hark Services integrations as an API for calling Hark.
Tomo
- Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
- Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Hark Pro or Tomo?
Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Tomo leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Other comparisons with Hark Pro or Tomo
- asaply vs Tomo
- Asmi vs Tomo
- AstrBot vs Tomo
- Boba vs Tomo
- Boski vs Tomo
- Brea vs Tomo
- Del vs Tomo
- HireAlpha vs Tomo
- OpenInstinct vs Tomo
- Orbits vs Tomo
- Orchid vs Tomo
- PicoClaw vs Tomo
- szn vs Tomo
- Tab vs Tomo
- asaply vs Hark Pro
- Asmi vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Tomo
- Boba vs Hark Pro
- Boski vs Hark Pro
- Brea vs Hark Pro
- Caddy vs Hark Pro
- CowAgent vs Hark Pro
- Del vs Hark Pro
- folk vs Hark Pro
- GAIA vs Hark Pro
- Gemini Spark vs Hark Pro
- Grok Bot vs Hark Pro
- Hark Pro vs Haven
- Hark Pro vs Hermes Agent
- Hark Pro vs HireAlpha
- Hark Pro vs Instinct
- Hark Pro vs IronClaw
- Hark Pro vs Leon
- Hark Pro vs Lindy
- Hark Pro vs nanobot
- Hark Pro vs NanoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Natura tinyNature
- Hark Pro vs Dots
- Hark Pro vs OpenClaw
- Hark Pro vs OpenInstinct
- Hark Pro vs Orbits
- Hark Pro vs Orchid
- Hark Pro vs Pally
- Hark Pro vs PicoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Poke
- Hark Pro vs QwenPaw
- Hark Pro vs szn
- Hark Pro vs Tab
- Hark Pro vs Talorys
- Hark Pro vs Town
- Hark Pro vs Wajo (Fo)
- Hark Pro vs Zapia
- Hark Pro vs ZeroClaw
- Hark Pro vs Zo Computer
- Talorys vs Tomo
- Caddy vs Tomo
- CowAgent vs Tomo
- folk vs Tomo
- GAIA vs Tomo
- Gemini Spark vs Tomo
- Grok Bot vs Tomo
- Haven vs Tomo
- Hermes Agent vs Tomo
- Instinct vs Tomo
- IronClaw vs Tomo
- Leon vs Tomo
- Lindy vs Tomo
- nanobot vs Tomo
- NanoClaw vs Tomo
- Natura tinyNature vs Tomo
- Dots vs Tomo
- OpenClaw vs Tomo
- Pally vs Tomo
- Poke vs Tomo
- QwenPaw vs Tomo
- Tomo vs Town
- Tomo vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tomo vs Zapia
- Tomo vs ZeroClaw
- Tomo vs Zo Computer
Disclosure
Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hark-pro-vs-tomo.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hark-pro.json·/api/v1/tools/tomo.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hark-pro tomo(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hark-pro", "b": "tomo"}at/mcp, no key