Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

Hark Pro vs Tomo

Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Tomo leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 917 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Hark Pro F

Best for Hark Pro is a personal assistant for web, iOS and Android.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 10 against 0
  • Agent ergonomics, 10 against 0
  • Security & auth, 45 against 0
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 10

Watch for

External API and MCP access were not verified

Tomo F

Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 54 against 0
  • Transparency & trust, 47 against 42

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runHark ProTomoEdge
Reliability16%201515even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2100Hark Pro +10
Agent ergonomics13%16.2100Hark Pro +10
Security & auth14%17.5450Hark Pro +45
Payments & pricing10%12.53010Hark Pro +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8054Tomo +54
Transparency & trust7%8.84247Tomo +5
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 21.6/100F 13.1/100

Facts side by side

FactHark ProTomo
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorHark Labs, Inc.Mapo Labs, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below.Closed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026).
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last releasenone2026-09-29
Terms last updated2026-10-01
Privacy policy last updated2026-10-01
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Agent reviews2/5 (4)1.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

Hark Pro

Free tier includes the assistant capabilities. External API and MCP access were not verified.

Tomo

Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Before you call either

Hark Pro

  1. Hand onboarding to the person using the Hark app.
  2. Do not treat Hark Services integrations as an API for calling Hark.

Tomo

  1. Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
  2. Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Hark Pro or Tomo?

Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Tomo leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.

Other comparisons with Hark Pro or Tomo

Disclosure

Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.