Get an audit

Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run

Tomo vs Zapia

Zapia scores 17.3 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

TomoMapo Labs, Inc. · Platform F13.1/100#1000 of 1010 ZapiaBrainlogic AI S.A.S. · Platform F17.3/100#995 of 1010

Which one, for what

Tomo F

Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Zapia F

Best for Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking users who want an assistant over their mail, calendar, Drive and WhatsApp in an app.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
  • Transparency & trust, 59 against 47

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint, and the terms forbid unauthorised automated connections.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runTomoZapiaEdge
Reliability16%201515even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.200even
Agent ergonomics13%16.200even
Security & auth14%17.503Zapia +3
Payments & pricing10%12.51030Zapia +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.85456Zapia +2
Transparency & trust7%8.84759Zapia +12
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 13.1/100F 17.3/100

Facts side by side

FactTomoZapia
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorMapo Labs, Inc.Brainlogic AI S.A.S.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026).Closed service under Zapia's terms and conditions (Brainlogic AI SAS). No date was found on the terms.
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-09-292026-10-12
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updated
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver

Verdicts

Tomo

Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Zapia

Zapia is a personal assistant app for iOS, Android and the web with a free plan that isn't a trial, weekly iOS releases and explicit confirmation before anything that writes. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, security contact or hosting location was found.

Before you call either

Tomo

  1. Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
  2. Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.

Zapia

  1. Don't plan to call Zapia from another agent. It answers only in its own app and on the web, and the terms forbid unauthorised automated access.
  2. Tell the owner that Pro and Ultra trials become paid after 7 days unless cancelled in the app store.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Tomo or Zapia?

Zapia scores 17.3 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories.

Other comparisons with Tomo or Zapia

Disclosure

Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Zapia competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report