Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run

Orchid vs Tomo

Orchid scores 20.2 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Tomo leads on maintenance & community. Both do assistants reached by message.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Orchid F

Best for A founder or operator who wants Gmail and calendar triage by text with approval before anything leaves.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 50 against 15
  • Schema & documentation, 10 against 0
  • Transparency & trust, 60 against 47

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Tomo F

Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 54 against 24

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runOrchidTomoEdge
Reliability16%205015Orchid +35
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2100Orchid +10
Agent ergonomics13%16.200even
Security & auth14%17.500even
Payments & pricing10%12.51010even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.82454Tomo +30
Transparency & trust7%8.86047Orchid +13
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 20.2/100F 13.1/100

Facts side by side

FactOrchidTomo
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorZero Email, Inc.Mapo Labs, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Orchid's Terms of Service (Zero Email, Inc., last updated 16 January 2026).Closed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026).
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last releasenone2026-09-29
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updated
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver

Verdicts

Orchid

Orchid is a paid executive assistant over iMessage, SMS and Telegram that holds drafts and calendar holds until the owner approves, with a public status page and a named subprocessor list. No outside agent can call it, there's no free tier, and its privacy policy allows training a personal model while its blog says it never trains.

Tomo

Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Before you call either

Orchid

  1. Don't plan to call Orchid from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, SMS and Telegram threads.
  2. Check status.orchid.ai before telling the owner Orchid is down. The 7 August incident moved it to a new number.
  3. Tell the owner that drafts and holds wait for their approval unless they widen it.

Tomo

  1. Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
  2. Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Orchid or Tomo?

Orchid scores 20.2 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Tomo leads on maintenance & community.

Other comparisons with Orchid or Tomo

Disclosure

Orchid competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.