Get an audit

Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run

QwenPaw vs Tomo

QwenPaw scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons

QwenPawAgentScope · Agent harness B62.2/100#454 of 993 TomoMapo Labs, Inc. · Platform F13.1/100#989 of 993

Which one, for what

QwenPaw B

Best for One person who wants an assistant on Chinese and Western chat apps with scheduled digests, a consumer mailbox and file-based memory, on their own machine and with a model of their choice.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 15
  • Schema & documentation, 68 against 0
  • Agent ergonomics, 67 against 0
  • Security & auth, 60 against 0
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 10
  • Maintenance & community, 73 against 54
  • Transparency & trust, 56 against 47

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Runs on your own machine
  • Open source

Watch for

Usage data is on by default, qwenpaw init --defaults accepts it without a prompt, and the opt-out variable is absent from the README and docs

Tomo F

Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where QwenPaw loses 3 points for them

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runQwenPawTomoEdge
Reliability16%207015QwenPaw +55
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2680QwenPaw +68
Agent ergonomics13%16.2670QwenPaw +67
Security & auth14%17.5600QwenPaw +60
Payments & pricing10%12.56010QwenPaw +50
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87354QwenPaw +19
Transparency & trust7%8.85647QwenPaw +9
Negative events≤15-30
TotalB 62.2/100F 13.1/100

Facts side by side

FactQwenPawTomo
KindAgent harnessPlatform
VendorAgentScopeMapo Labs, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP, stdio
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreePaid
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Closed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026).
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-09-112026-09-29
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity36k starsnone

Verdicts

QwenPaw

Mail tools ask for approval by default, automatic mail handling may not delete permanently, and the security docs list what each sandbox backend fails to enforce. Usage data is sent by default, the default approval level passes every tool call no rule flags, and no privacy policy or security advisory is published.

Tomo

Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Before you call either

QwenPaw

  1. Set QWENPAW_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=true before qwenpaw init --defaults or qwenpaw app. Both send usage data without asking
  2. Set approval_level to STRICT or SMART in agent.json. The default AUTO runs every tool call no guard rule flags
  3. Set dm_policy and group_policy to allowlist with allow_from on each channel. Both default to open
  4. Set QWENPAW_AUTH_ENABLED=true before binding beyond 127.0.0.1. Requests from localhost skip login even then
  5. Keep mail tools on ask for send_message, delete_message and delete_thread, and turn on Mail Access Control with automatic handling

Tomo

  1. Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
  2. Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, QwenPaw or Tomo?

QwenPaw scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in every scored category.

Are QwenPaw and Tomo open source?

QwenPaw is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Tomo.

Other comparisons with QwenPaw or Tomo

Disclosure

Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report