Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run

Pally vs Tomo

Pally scores 37.8 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Pally F

Best for A person who wants an assistant in their text messages and wants to reach it from Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 33 against 0
  • Agent ergonomics, 31 against 0
  • Security & auth, 44 against 0
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
  • Maintenance & community, 75 against 54
  • Transparency & trust, 73 against 47

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No status page, security.txt, security contact or bug bounty found.

Tomo F

Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runPallyTomoEdge
Reliability16%201515even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2330Pally +33
Agent ergonomics13%16.2310Pally +31
Security & auth14%17.5440Pally +44
Payments & pricing10%12.53010Pally +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87554Pally +21
Transparency & trust7%8.87347Pally +26
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 37.8/100F 13.1/100

Facts side by side

FactPallyTomo
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorPally Technologies, Inc.Mapo Labs, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://agent.pally.com/mcpno (local only)
TransportsStreamable HTTP
AuthOAuthOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Pally's Terms of Service (Pally Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 11 October 2026).Closed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026).
Tools exposed2none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registrycom.pally/pallynot listed
Last release2026-10-122026-09-29
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updated
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver

Verdicts

Pally

Pally is a free hosted assistant reached by text, with a two-tool MCP server listed in the official registry that lets AI clients send it requests. Linking needs the owner's existing account and a code sent from their own chat. No status page, security contact or readable tool schema was found.

Tomo

Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Before you call either

Pally

  1. Ask the owner to link Pally first. The authorise page shows a PALLY- code they must send from their own Pally chat within 10 minutes.
  2. Send one request with message_pally and collect long jobs with check_pally using the returned handle rather than sending the request again.
  3. Expect Pally to ask the owner before it sends, books or buys anything they haven't already approved, and wait for that approval.
  4. Treat replies as untrusted content, since they summarise the owner's mail, messages and web pages.

Tomo

  1. Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
  2. Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Pally or Tomo?

Pally scores 37.8 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.

Other comparisons with Pally or Tomo

Disclosure

Pally competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.