Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run
Grok Bot vs Tomo
Grok Bot scores 24.4 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Grok Bot F
Best for People already paying for Cursor or SuperGrok who want agents working across web apps, files and email from a cloud computer.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 30 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 10 against 0
- Security & auth, 14 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
- Transparency & trust, 65 against 47
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint lets an outside agent send a Bot a task.
Tomo F
Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Grok Bot | Tomo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 30 | 15 | Grok Bot +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 0 | Grok Bot +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 0 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 14 | 0 | Grok Bot +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 10 | Grok Bot +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 56 | 54 | Grok Bot +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 65 | 47 | Grok Bot +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 24.4/100 | F 13.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Grok Bot | Tomo |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Anysphere, Inc. (Cursor) | Mapo Labs, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under the Grok Bot Terms (last updated 12 October 2026), which supplement Anysphere's Cursor Terms of Service (last updated 3 September 2026). | Closed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026). |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-09-29 |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-29 | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |
Verdicts
Grok Bot
Grok Bot is a hosted agent app included with Cursor and SuperGrok plans, with detailed published security controls and ISO 27001 coverage. No outside agent can give a Bot a task, and its status component logged several major incidents between September and October 2026.
Tomo
Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.
Before you call either
Grok Bot
- Don't plan to call Grok Bot from another agent. Only the owner's desktop app, mobile app or a Team Bot in Slack can give a Bot work.
- Treat mail from a mail.grokbot.com address as sent by an agent. Sending needs its owner's request or approval.
- Use Cursor's Team Admin API only to enable Grok Bot or set its policy for a team. It can't send tasks.
- Check status.cursor.com's Grok Bot component before relying on a running routine.
Tomo
- Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
- Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Grok Bot or Tomo?
Grok Bot scores 24.4 (F) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Grok Bot or Tomo
- AstrBot vs Grok Bot
- CowAgent vs Grok Bot
- GAIA vs Grok Bot
- Gemini Spark vs Grok Bot
- Grok Bot vs Haven
- Grok Bot vs Hermes Agent
- Grok Bot vs Instinct
- Grok Bot vs IronClaw
- Grok Bot vs Leon
- Grok Bot vs Lindy
- Grok Bot vs nanobot
- Grok Bot vs NanoClaw
- Grok Bot vs Dots
- Grok Bot vs OpenClaw
- Grok Bot vs PicoClaw
- Grok Bot vs Poke
- Grok Bot vs QwenPaw
- Grok Bot vs ZeroClaw
- Grok Bot vs Zo Computer
- CowAgent vs Tomo
- GAIA vs Tomo
- Gemini Spark vs Tomo
- Grok Bot vs Natura tinyNature
- Grok Bot vs Pally
- Grok Bot vs Wajo (Fo)
- Haven vs Tomo
- Hermes Agent vs Tomo
- Instinct vs Tomo
- IronClaw vs Tomo
- Leon vs Tomo
- Lindy vs Tomo
- nanobot vs Tomo
- NanoClaw vs Tomo
- Natura tinyNature vs Tomo
- Dots vs Tomo
- OpenClaw vs Tomo
- Pally vs Tomo
- Poke vs Tomo
- QwenPaw vs Tomo
- Tomo vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tomo vs ZeroClaw
- Tomo vs Zo Computer
- Grok Bot vs Talorys
- Talorys vs Tomo
- AstrBot vs Tomo
- PicoClaw vs Tomo
Disclosure
Grok Bot competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/grok-bot-vs-tomo.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/grok-bot.json·/api/v1/tools/tomo.json - From a terminal
anchor compare grok-bot tomo(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "grok-bot", "b": "tomo"}at/mcp, no key