Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run
Tomo vs Town
Town scores 48.7 (D) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Tomo F
Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Town D
Best for An owner who wants a mail and calendar assistant whose routines other systems can trigger.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 33 against 0
- Agent ergonomics, 49 against 0
- Security & auth, 79 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
- Maintenance & community, 60 against 54
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 47
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The privacy policy describes training with an opt-out and the trust page says training is opt-in.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Tomo | Town | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 35 | Town +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 0 | 33 | Town +33 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 49 | Town +49 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 79 | Town +79 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 30 | Town +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 54 | 60 | Town +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 47 | 63 | Town +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 13.1/100 | D 48.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Tomo | Town |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Mapo Labs, Inc. | Town.com, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026). | Closed service under Town's Terms of Service (Town.com, Inc., updated 21 July 2026). |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-10-10 |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | ||
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |
Verdicts
Tomo
Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.
Town
Town is a hosted assistant that works across the owner's mail, calendar and work apps, and other systems can start its routines through per-routine webhooks with rotatable secrets, idempotency keys and documented errors. A caller can't read a run's result. The privacy policy and trust page disagree on whether training is on by default.
Before you call either
Tomo
- Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
- Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.
Town
- Start a Town routine with POST to its webhook URL, Authorization Bearer whsec_ secret, and application/json or text/plain. Expect 202 only.
- Send X-Town-Idempotency-Key with a stable event id on every retry so Town doesn't start a second run.
- Treat 404 as wrong secret, disabled endpoint or missing endpoint alike, and ask the owner to check Routine Settings rather than retrying.
- Send account_email only if the owner allowed the override. It must match a connected account in full and can't widen the routine's scope.
- Ask the owner to keep routines that act on webhook input in approval-required mode, as Town's own docs advise.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Tomo or Town?
Town scores 48.7 (D) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Tomo or Town
- asaply vs Tomo
- asaply vs Town
- Asmi vs Tomo
- Asmi vs Town
- AstrBot vs Tomo
- Boba vs Tomo
- Boba vs Town
- Boski vs Tomo
- Brea vs Tomo
- Brea vs Town
- Del vs Tomo
- Del vs Town
- HireAlpha vs Tomo
- HireAlpha vs Town
- OpenInstinct vs Tomo
- OpenInstinct vs Town
- Orbits vs Tomo
- Orbits vs Town
- Orchid vs Tomo
- Orchid vs Town
- PicoClaw vs Tomo
- szn vs Tomo
- szn vs Town
- Tab vs Tomo
- Tab vs Town
- Town vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Town
- Boski vs Town
- Caddy vs Town
- CowAgent vs Town
- folk vs Town
- GAIA vs Town
- Gemini Spark vs Town
- Grok Bot vs Town
- Haven vs Town
- Hermes Agent vs Town
- Instinct vs Town
- IronClaw vs Town
- Leon vs Town
- Lindy vs Town
- nanobot vs Town
- NanoClaw vs Town
- Dots vs Town
- OpenClaw vs Town
- PicoClaw vs Town
- Poke vs Town
- QwenPaw vs Town
- Town vs ZeroClaw
- Town vs Zo Computer
- Caddy vs Tomo
- CowAgent vs Tomo
- folk vs Tomo
- GAIA vs Tomo
- Gemini Spark vs Tomo
- Grok Bot vs Tomo
- Haven vs Tomo
- Hermes Agent vs Tomo
- Instinct vs Tomo
- IronClaw vs Tomo
- Leon vs Tomo
- Lindy vs Tomo
- nanobot vs Tomo
- NanoClaw vs Tomo
- Natura tinyNature vs Tomo
- Natura tinyNature vs Town
- Dots vs Tomo
- OpenClaw vs Tomo
- Pally vs Tomo
- Pally vs Town
- Poke vs Tomo
- QwenPaw vs Tomo
- Tomo vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tomo vs Zapia
- Tomo vs ZeroClaw
- Tomo vs Zo Computer
- Town vs Wajo (Fo)
- Talorys vs Tomo
- Talorys vs Town
Disclosure
Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Town competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/tomo-vs-town.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/tomo.json·/api/v1/tools/town.json - From a terminal
anchor compare tomo town(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "tomo", "b": "town"}at/mcp, no key