Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run
Lobby vs Town
Town scores 48.7 (D) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Lobby F
Best for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Town D
Best for An owner who wants a mail and calendar assistant whose routines other systems can trigger.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 33 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 49 against 0
- Security & auth, 79 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 60 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 43
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The privacy policy describes training with an opt-out and the trust page says training is opt-in.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Lobby | Town | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 35 | Town +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 33 | Town +23 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 49 | Town +49 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 79 | Town +79 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 30 | Town +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 2 | 60 | Town +58 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 43 | 63 | Town +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 11.1/100 | D 48.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Lobby | Town |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Lobby OS, Inc. | Town.com, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026. | Closed service under Town's Terms of Service (Town.com, Inc., updated 21 July 2026). |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-10 |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | ||
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Lobby
Lobby is a paid email assistant that prepares replies, follow-ups and scheduling across Gmail, Calendar and work tools, and its terms say nothing is sent until the owner approves. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found on 21 October 2026.
Town
Town is a hosted assistant that works across the owner's mail, calendar and work apps, and other systems can start its routines through per-routine webhooks with rotatable secrets, idempotency keys and documented errors. A caller can't read a run's result. The privacy policy and trust page disagree on whether training is on by default.
Before you call either
Lobby
- Don't plan to call Lobby from another agent. It works only inside its own app for the signed-in owner.
- Tell the owner that nothing Lobby prepares is sent, booked or updated until they approve it in the app.
- Check whether the 7-day trial takes a card before signing the owner up. The terms don't say.
Town
- Start a Town routine with POST to its webhook URL, Authorization Bearer whsec_ secret, and application/json or text/plain. Expect 202 only.
- Send X-Town-Idempotency-Key with a stable event id on every retry so Town doesn't start a second run.
- Treat 404 as wrong secret, disabled endpoint or missing endpoint alike, and ask the owner to check Routine Settings rather than retrying.
- Send account_email only if the owner allowed the override. It must match a connected account in full and can't widen the routine's scope.
- Ask the owner to keep routines that act on webhook input in approval-required mode, as Town's own docs advise.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Lobby or Town?
Town scores 48.7 (D) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Lobby or Town
- asaply vs Town
- Asmi vs Town
- Boba vs Town
- Brea vs Town
- Del vs Town
- HireAlpha vs Town
- OpenInstinct vs Town
- Orbits vs Town
- Orchid vs Town
- szn vs Town
- Tab vs Town
- Tasker AI vs Town
- Town vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Lobby
- AstrBot vs Town
- Boski vs Lobby
- Boski vs Town
- Caddy vs Lobby
- Caddy vs Town
- CowAgent vs Lobby
- CowAgent vs Town
- folk vs Lobby
- folk vs Town
- GAIA vs Lobby
- GAIA vs Town
- Gemini Spark vs Lobby
- Gemini Spark vs Town
- Grok Bot vs Lobby
- Grok Bot vs Town
- Haven vs Lobby
- Haven vs Town
- Hermes Agent vs Lobby
- Hermes Agent vs Town
- Instinct vs Lobby
- Instinct vs Town
- IronClaw vs Lobby
- IronClaw vs Town
- Leon vs Lobby
- Leon vs Town
- Lindy vs Lobby
- Lindy vs Town
- Lobby vs PicoClaw
- nanobot vs Town
- NanoClaw vs Town
- Dots vs Town
- OpenClaw vs Town
- PicoClaw vs Town
- Poke vs Town
- QwenPaw vs Town
- Town vs ZeroClaw
- Town vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Lobby
- Brea vs Lobby
- Del vs Lobby
- HireAlpha vs Lobby
- Lobby vs nanobot
- Lobby vs NanoClaw
- Lobby vs Natura tinyNature
- Lobby vs Dots
- Lobby vs OpenClaw
- Lobby vs OpenInstinct
- Lobby vs Orbits
- Lobby vs Orchid
- Lobby vs Pally
- Lobby vs Poke
- Lobby vs QwenPaw
- Lobby vs szn
- Lobby vs Tasker AI
- Lobby vs Tomo
- Lobby vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Zapia
- Lobby vs ZeroClaw
- Lobby vs Zo Computer
- Natura tinyNature vs Town
- Pally vs Town
- Tomo vs Town
- Town vs Wajo (Fo)
- Asmi vs Lobby
- Atticus vs Lobby
- Atticus vs Town
- Boba vs Lobby
- Hark Pro vs Lobby
- Hark Pro vs Town
- Lobby vs Tab
- Lobby vs Talorys
- Talorys vs Town
Disclosure
Lobby competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Town competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lobby-os-vs-town.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lobby-os.json·/api/v1/tools/town.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lobby-os town(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lobby-os", "b": "town"}at/mcp, no key