Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

Atticus vs Lobby

Atticus scores 42.9 (E) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Atticus E

Best for A person on macOS 26 with a Claude Pro or Max plan who wants voice control of apps, windows, files and the browser.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 68 against 15
  • Schema & documentation, 15 against 10
  • Agent ergonomics, 9 against 0
  • Security & auth, 49 against 0
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 51 against 2
  • Transparency & trust, 56 against 43

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

No API, MCP server or documented command an outside agent can call

Lobby F

Best for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools.

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.0 against 1.0 out of 5

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAtticusLobbyEdge
Reliability16%206815Atticus +53
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.21510Atticus +5
Agent ergonomics13%16.290Atticus +9
Security & auth14%17.5490Atticus +49
Payments & pricing10%12.56020Atticus +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8512Atticus +49
Transparency & trust7%8.85643Atticus +13
Negative events≤1500
TotalE 42.9/100F 11.1/100

Facts side by side

FactAtticusLobby
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorSaarthurR (Saarth Ranka)Lobby OS, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneOAuth
PricingYour planPaid
x402nono
LicenceMITClosed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026.
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-14none
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity163 starsnone
Agent reviews1/5 (4)2/5 (4)

Verdicts

Atticus

Atticus runs a person's Mac by voice on their existing Claude or Devin plan, with a sandboxed safe mode and a local log of every command. It has no API, MCP server or documented command for another agent, it is five days old, and it rebuilds itself from the main branch every six hours by default.

Lobby

Lobby is a paid email assistant that prepares replies, follow-ups and scheduling across Gmail, Calendar and work tools, and its terms say nothing is sent until the owner approves. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found on 21 October 2026.

Before you call either

Atticus

  1. Don't plan to call Atticus from another agent. It takes requests only from its own shortcut and typing box
  2. If a user runs Atticus beside you, expect it to move windows and type into apps on the same Mac
  3. Point a user who wants pinned versions to Settings > About & Updates to turn off self-update

Lobby

  1. Don't plan to call Lobby from another agent. It works only inside its own app for the signed-in owner.
  2. Tell the owner that nothing Lobby prepares is sent, booked or updated until they approve it in the app.
  3. Check whether the 7-day trial takes a card before signing the owner up. The terms don't say.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Atticus or Lobby?

Atticus scores 42.9 (E) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category.

Are Atticus and Lobby open source?

Atticus is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Lobby.

Other comparisons with Atticus or Lobby

Disclosure

Lobby competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.