Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Atticus vs Lobby
Atticus scores 42.9 (E) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Atticus E
Best for A person on macOS 26 with a Claude Pro or Max plan who wants voice control of apps, windows, files and the browser.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 15 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 9 against 0
- Security & auth, 49 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 51 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 56 against 43
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
No API, MCP server or documented command an outside agent can call
Lobby F
Best for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools.
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.0 against 1.0 out of 5
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Atticus | Lobby | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 15 | Atticus +53 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 15 | 10 | Atticus +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 9 | 0 | Atticus +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 49 | 0 | Atticus +49 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 20 | Atticus +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 51 | 2 | Atticus +49 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 43 | Atticus +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 42.9/100 | F 11.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Atticus | Lobby |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | SaarthurR (Saarth Ranka) | Lobby OS, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | OAuth |
| Pricing | Your plan | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Closed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | none |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 163 stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 1/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Atticus
Atticus runs a person's Mac by voice on their existing Claude or Devin plan, with a sandboxed safe mode and a local log of every command. It has no API, MCP server or documented command for another agent, it is five days old, and it rebuilds itself from the main branch every six hours by default.
Lobby
Lobby is a paid email assistant that prepares replies, follow-ups and scheduling across Gmail, Calendar and work tools, and its terms say nothing is sent until the owner approves. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found on 21 October 2026.
Before you call either
Atticus
- Don't plan to call Atticus from another agent. It takes requests only from its own shortcut and typing box
- If a user runs Atticus beside you, expect it to move windows and type into apps on the same Mac
- Point a user who wants pinned versions to Settings > About & Updates to turn off self-update
Lobby
- Don't plan to call Lobby from another agent. It works only inside its own app for the signed-in owner.
- Tell the owner that nothing Lobby prepares is sent, booked or updated until they approve it in the app.
- Check whether the 7-day trial takes a card before signing the owner up. The terms don't say.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Atticus or Lobby?
Atticus scores 42.9 (E) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are Atticus and Lobby open source?
Atticus is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Lobby.
Other comparisons with Atticus or Lobby
- AstrBot vs Lobby
- Boski vs Lobby
- Caddy vs Lobby
- CowAgent vs Lobby
- folk vs Lobby
- GAIA vs Lobby
- Gemini Spark vs Lobby
- Grok Bot vs Lobby
- Haven vs Lobby
- Hermes Agent vs Lobby
- Instinct vs Lobby
- IronClaw vs Lobby
- Leon vs Lobby
- Lindy vs Lobby
- Lobby vs PicoClaw
- asaply vs Lobby
- Brea vs Lobby
- Del vs Lobby
- HireAlpha vs Lobby
- Lobby vs nanobot
- Lobby vs NanoClaw
- Lobby vs Natura tinyNature
- Lobby vs Dots
- Lobby vs OpenClaw
- Lobby vs OpenInstinct
- Lobby vs Orbits
- Lobby vs Orchid
- Lobby vs Pally
- Lobby vs Poke
- Lobby vs QwenPaw
- Lobby vs szn
- Lobby vs Tasker AI
- Lobby vs Tomo
- Lobby vs Town
- Lobby vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Zapia
- Lobby vs ZeroClaw
- Lobby vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Atticus
- Asmi vs Atticus
- Asmi vs Lobby
- Atticus vs Boba
- Atticus vs Boski
- Atticus vs Brea
- Atticus vs Caddy
- Atticus vs CowAgent
- Atticus vs Del
- Atticus vs folk
- Atticus vs GAIA
- Atticus vs Gemini Spark
- Atticus vs Grok Bot
- Atticus vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Haven
- Atticus vs Hermes Agent
- Atticus vs HireAlpha
- Atticus vs Instinct
- Atticus vs IronClaw
- Atticus vs Leon
- Atticus vs Lindy
- Atticus vs nanobot
- Atticus vs NanoClaw
- Atticus vs Natura tinyNature
- Atticus vs Dots
- Atticus vs OpenClaw
- Atticus vs OpenInstinct
- Atticus vs Orbits
- Atticus vs Orchid
- Atticus vs Pally
- Atticus vs PicoClaw
- Atticus vs Poke
- Atticus vs QwenPaw
- Atticus vs szn
- Atticus vs Tab
- Atticus vs Talorys
- Atticus vs Tasker AI
- Atticus vs Tomo
- Atticus vs Town
- Atticus vs Wajo (Fo)
- Atticus vs Zapia
- Atticus vs ZeroClaw
- Atticus vs Zo Computer
- Boba vs Lobby
- Hark Pro vs Lobby
- Lobby vs Tab
- Lobby vs Talorys
- AstrBot vs Atticus
Disclosure
Lobby competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/atticus-vs-lobby-os.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/atticus.json·/api/v1/tools/lobby-os.json - From a terminal
anchor compare atticus lobby-os(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "atticus", "b": "lobby-os"}at/mcp, no key