Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
LearnHarness vs Lobby
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.2 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 56 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 63 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 60 against 0
- Security & auth, 52 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 71 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 45
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
Lobby F
Best for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LearnHarness | Lobby | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 56 | 15 | LearnHarness +41 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 63 | 10 | LearnHarness +53 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 60 | 0 | LearnHarness +60 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 0 | LearnHarness +52 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 20 | LearnHarness +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 71 | 2 | LearnHarness +69 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 45 | LearnHarness +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59.3/100 | F 11.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LearnHarness | Lobby |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Platform |
| Vendor | Amos Blomqvist | Lobby OS, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | OAuth |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0-only | Closed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-29 | none |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-03-26 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-03-26 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 4.2k stars | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LearnHarness
The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.
Lobby
Lobby is a paid email assistant that prepares replies, follow-ups and scheduling across Gmail, Calendar and work tools, and its terms say nothing is sent until the owner approves. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found on 21 October 2026.
Before you call either
LearnHarness
- Use the bundled skill (
skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing - Pass
--format jsonbefore the subcommand, for examplepython3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions - Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
- Do not read
auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text - Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes
Lobby
- Don't plan to call Lobby from another agent. It works only inside its own app for the signed-in owner.
- Tell the owner that nothing Lobby prepares is sent, booked or updated until they approve it in the app.
- Check whether the 7-day trial takes a card before signing the owner up. The terms don't say.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or Lobby?
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.2 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are LearnHarness and Lobby open source?
LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). No open-source release is listed for Lobby.
Other comparisons with LearnHarness or Lobby
- AstrBot vs Lobby
- Boski vs Lobby
- Caddy vs Lobby
- Claude Duet vs Lobby
- CowAgent vs Lobby
- folk vs Lobby
- GAIA vs Lobby
- Gemini Spark vs Lobby
- Grok Bot vs Lobby
- Haven vs Lobby
- Hermes Agent vs Lobby
- Instinct vs Lobby
- IronClaw vs Lobby
- Leon vs Lobby
- Lindy vs Lobby
- Lobby vs PicoClaw
- asaply vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs Lobby
- Atticus vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs Lobby
- Boba vs LearnHarness
- Boba vs Lobby
- Boski vs LearnHarness
- Brea vs LearnHarness
- Caddy vs LearnHarness
- Claude Duet vs LearnHarness
- CowAgent vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs Lobby
- Del vs LearnHarness
- folk vs LearnHarness
- GAIA vs LearnHarness
- Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness
- Grok Bot vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs Lobby
- Haven vs LearnHarness
- Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness
- HireAlpha vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- IronClaw vs LearnHarness
- LearnHarness vs Leon
- LearnHarness vs Lindy
- LearnHarness vs nanobot
- LearnHarness vs NanoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature
- LearnHarness vs Dots
- LearnHarness vs OpenClaw
- LearnHarness vs OpenDuet
- LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Orchid
- LearnHarness vs Pally
- LearnHarness vs PicoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Poke
- LearnHarness vs QwenPaw
- LearnHarness vs szn
- LearnHarness vs Tab
- LearnHarness vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Tasker AI
- LearnHarness vs Tomo
- LearnHarness vs Town
- LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo)
- LearnHarness vs Zapia
- LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw
- LearnHarness vs Zo Computer
- Lobby vs Tab
- Lobby vs Talorys
- asaply vs Lobby
- Brea vs Lobby
- Del vs Lobby
- HireAlpha vs Lobby
- Lobby vs nanobot
- Lobby vs NanoClaw
- Lobby vs Natura tinyNature
- Lobby vs Dots
- Lobby vs OpenClaw
- Lobby vs OpenDuet
- Lobby vs OpenInstinct
- Lobby vs Orbits
- Lobby vs Orchid
- Lobby vs Pally
- Lobby vs Poke
- Lobby vs QwenPaw
- Lobby vs szn
- Lobby vs Tasker AI
- Lobby vs Tomo
- Lobby vs Town
- Lobby vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Zapia
- Lobby vs ZeroClaw
- Lobby vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs LearnHarness
Disclosure
Lobby competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/learnharness-vs-lobby-os.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/learnharness.json·/api/v1/tools/lobby-os.json - From a terminal
anchor compare learnharness lobby-os(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "learnharness", "b": "lobby-os"}at/mcp, no key