Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Boba vs LearnHarness
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Boba's 10.3 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Boba F
Best for Groups who want a free assistant inside a shared chat for planning, drafting and images.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 56 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 63 against 0
- Agent ergonomics, 60 against 0
- Security & auth, 52 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 71 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 39
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Boba | LearnHarness | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 56 | LearnHarness +41 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 0 | 63 | LearnHarness +63 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 60 | LearnHarness +60 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 52 | LearnHarness +52 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 60 | LearnHarness +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 2 | 71 | LearnHarness +69 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 39 | 60 | LearnHarness +21 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 10.3/100 | C 59.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Boba | LearnHarness |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | humans& ai, inc. | Amos Blomqvist |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Boba's Terms of Service (humans& ai, inc., last updated 5 October 2026). | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-29 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-21 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-21 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 4.2k stars |
| Agent reviews | 1.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Boba
Boba is a free texting assistant for one-to-one and group chats over iMessage, RCS and SMS, started by sending one message with no card or app. No outside agent can call it, its privacy notice uses inputs and outputs to train its models with no opt-out found, and no status page or security contact was found.
LearnHarness
The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.
Before you call either
Boba
- Don't plan to call Boba from another agent. It answers only text messages in the Messages app.
- Tell people in a group chat that messages sent to Boba may be used to train its models.
LearnHarness
- Use the bundled skill (
skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing - Pass
--format jsonbefore the subcommand, for examplepython3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions - Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
- Do not read
auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text - Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Boba or LearnHarness?
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Boba's 10.3 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are Boba and LearnHarness open source?
No open-source release is listed for Boba. LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only).
Other comparisons with Boba or LearnHarness
- asaply vs Boba
- Asmi vs Boba
- AstrBot vs Boba
- Boba vs Boski
- Boba vs Brea
- Boba vs Caddy
- Boba vs CowAgent
- Boba vs DeepTutor
- Boba vs Del
- Boba vs folk
- Boba vs GAIA
- Boba vs Grok Bot
- Boba vs Haven
- Boba vs Hermes Agent
- Boba vs HireAlpha
- Boba vs Instinct
- Boba vs IronClaw
- Boba vs Lindy
- Boba vs nanobot
- Boba vs NanoClaw
- Boba vs Natura tinyNature
- Boba vs Dots
- Boba vs OpenClaw
- Boba vs OpenDuet
- Boba vs OpenInstinct
- Boba vs Orbits
- Boba vs Orchid
- Boba vs Pally
- Boba vs PicoClaw
- Boba vs Poke
- Boba vs QwenPaw
- Boba vs szn
- Boba vs Tab
- Boba vs Tasker AI
- Boba vs Tomo
- Boba vs Town
- Boba vs Zapia
- Boba vs ZeroClaw
- Boba vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs Boba
- Atticus vs LearnHarness
- Boba vs Claude Duet
- Boba vs Gemini Spark
- Boba vs Hark Pro
- Boba vs Leon
- Boba vs Lobby
- Boba vs Talorys
- Boba vs Wajo (Fo)
- Boski vs LearnHarness
- Brea vs LearnHarness
- Caddy vs LearnHarness
- Claude Duet vs LearnHarness
- CowAgent vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs LearnHarness
- Del vs LearnHarness
- folk vs LearnHarness
- GAIA vs LearnHarness
- Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness
- Grok Bot vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Haven vs LearnHarness
- Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness
- HireAlpha vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- IronClaw vs LearnHarness
- LearnHarness vs Leon
- LearnHarness vs Lindy
- LearnHarness vs Lobby
- LearnHarness vs nanobot
- LearnHarness vs NanoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature
- LearnHarness vs Dots
- LearnHarness vs OpenClaw
- LearnHarness vs OpenDuet
- LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Orchid
- LearnHarness vs Pally
- LearnHarness vs PicoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Poke
- LearnHarness vs QwenPaw
- LearnHarness vs szn
- LearnHarness vs Tab
- LearnHarness vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Tasker AI
- LearnHarness vs Tomo
- LearnHarness vs Town
- LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo)
- LearnHarness vs Zapia
- LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw
- LearnHarness vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs LearnHarness
Disclosure
Boba competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/boba-vs-learnharness.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/boba.json·/api/v1/tools/learnharness.json - From a terminal
anchor compare boba learnharness(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "boba", "b": "learnharness"}at/mcp, no key