Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
LearnHarness vs NanoClaw
NanoClaw scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where NanoClaw loses 5 points for them
Watch for
The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
NanoClaw B
Best for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine, reachable from chat apps, with container isolation and scheduled tasks, and who is willing to keep a fork.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 78 against 56
- Schema & documentation, 82 against 63
- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 60
- Security & auth, 74 against 52
- Maintenance & community, 78 against 71
- Transparency & trust, 69 against 60
Watch for
The Claude provider runs with permissionMode: 'bypassPermissions', so shell, file and web tools run inside the container with no prompt
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LearnHarness | NanoClaw | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 56 | 78 | NanoClaw +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 63 | 82 | NanoClaw +19 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 60 | 70 | NanoClaw +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 74 | NanoClaw +22 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 71 | 78 | NanoClaw +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 69 | NanoClaw +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | C 59.3/100 | B 68.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LearnHarness | NanoClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amos Blomqvist | NanoCo, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0-only | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-29 | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 4.2k stars | 31k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LearnHarness
The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.
NanoClaw
Each session runs in an unprivileged Docker container and API keys stay in a credential gateway on the host, so a manipulated agent cannot read them. Inside the container the agent runs with permission prompts off, network egress is open by default, and it can message any chat it is wired to without approval.
Before you call either
LearnHarness
- Use the bundled skill (
skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing - Pass
--format jsonbefore the subcommand, for examplepython3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions - Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
- Do not read
auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text - Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes
NanoClaw
- Install with
git cloneandbash nanoclaw.sh. There is no registry package, and setup needs Docker, Node 22 or later and a Claude or Codex credential - Set
NANOCLAW_EGRESS_LOCKDOWN=truebefore giving an agent credentials or an audience of strangers. The default leaves egress open - Put chats with different audiences in separate agent groups. Every session of a group shares one read-write workspace and memory tree
- Turn on per-request approval for a secret in the gateway when its use should wait for a person. It is off unless configured
- On OneCLI installs, move the gateway to 1.42.0 by the upgrade guide before updating to 2026.10.0. The updater stops until that is done
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or NanoClaw?
NanoClaw scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are LearnHarness and NanoClaw open source?
Yes. LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). NanoClaw is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with LearnHarness or NanoClaw
- asaply vs NanoClaw
- Asmi vs NanoClaw
- Boba vs NanoClaw
- Brea vs NanoClaw
- Del vs NanoClaw
- HireAlpha vs NanoClaw
- NanoClaw vs OpenInstinct
- NanoClaw vs Orbits
- NanoClaw vs Orchid
- NanoClaw vs szn
- NanoClaw vs Tab
- NanoClaw vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs NanoClaw
- Boski vs NanoClaw
- Caddy vs NanoClaw
- Claude Duet vs NanoClaw
- CowAgent vs NanoClaw
- folk vs NanoClaw
- GAIA vs NanoClaw
- Gemini Spark vs NanoClaw
- Grok Bot vs NanoClaw
- Haven vs NanoClaw
- Hermes Agent vs NanoClaw
- Instinct vs NanoClaw
- IronClaw vs NanoClaw
- Leon vs NanoClaw
- Lindy vs NanoClaw
- nanobot vs NanoClaw
- NanoClaw vs Dots
- NanoClaw vs OpenClaw
- NanoClaw vs OpenDuet
- NanoClaw vs PicoClaw
- NanoClaw vs Poke
- NanoClaw vs QwenPaw
- NanoClaw vs Tasker AI
- NanoClaw vs Town
- NanoClaw vs ZeroClaw
- NanoClaw vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs NanoClaw
- Boba vs LearnHarness
- Boski vs LearnHarness
- Brea vs LearnHarness
- Caddy vs LearnHarness
- Claude Duet vs LearnHarness
- CowAgent vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs NanoClaw
- Del vs LearnHarness
- folk vs LearnHarness
- GAIA vs LearnHarness
- Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness
- Grok Bot vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs NanoClaw
- Haven vs LearnHarness
- Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness
- HireAlpha vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- IronClaw vs LearnHarness
- LearnHarness vs Leon
- LearnHarness vs Lindy
- LearnHarness vs Lobby
- LearnHarness vs nanobot
- LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature
- LearnHarness vs Dots
- LearnHarness vs OpenClaw
- LearnHarness vs OpenDuet
- LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Orchid
- LearnHarness vs Pally
- LearnHarness vs PicoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Poke
- LearnHarness vs QwenPaw
- LearnHarness vs szn
- LearnHarness vs Tab
- LearnHarness vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Tasker AI
- LearnHarness vs Tomo
- LearnHarness vs Town
- LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo)
- LearnHarness vs Zapia
- LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw
- LearnHarness vs Zo Computer
- NanoClaw vs Talorys
- Lobby vs NanoClaw
- NanoClaw vs Natura tinyNature
- NanoClaw vs Pally
- NanoClaw vs Tomo
- NanoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- AstrBot vs LearnHarness
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/learnharness-vs-nanoclaw.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/learnharness.json·/api/v1/tools/nanoclaw.json - From a terminal
anchor compare learnharness nanoclaw(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "learnharness", "b": "nanoclaw"}at/mcp, no key