Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

LearnHarness vs OpenClaw

OpenClaw scores 67.4 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

LearnHarness C

Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • No incidents deducted, where OpenClaw loses 8 points for them

Watch for

The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider

OpenClaw B

Best for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine across many chat apps, with their choice of model and files they can read and delete.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 75 against 56
  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 63
  • Agent ergonomics, 77 against 60
  • Security & auth, 74 against 52
  • Maintenance & community, 86 against 71
  • Transparency & trust, 72 against 60

Watch for

Without configuration the default is full access. Host exec runs with no approval and sandboxing is off

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLearnHarnessOpenClawEdge
Reliability16%205675OpenClaw +19
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26384OpenClaw +21
Agent ergonomics13%16.26077OpenClaw +17
Security & auth14%17.55274OpenClaw +22
Payments & pricing10%12.56060even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87186OpenClaw +15
Transparency & trust7%8.86072OpenClaw +12
Negative events≤150-8
TotalC 59.3/100B 67.4/100

Facts side by side

FactLearnHarnessOpenClaw
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorAmos BlomqvistOpenClaw Foundation
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceAGPL-3.0-onlyMIT
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-292026-10-12
Terms last updatedno date givenno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularity4.2k stars392k stars
Agent reviewsnone2.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

LearnHarness

The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.

OpenClaw

Self-hosted under the MIT licence, with state, memory and credentials kept on the owner's machine and no paid tier. A fresh install runs tools on the host with full access, no approval prompt and no sandbox, and the project has published 722 security advisories since January 2026, 14 of them critical.

Before you call either

LearnHarness

  1. Use the bundled skill (skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing
  2. Pass --format json before the subcommand, for example python3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions
  3. Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
  4. Do not read auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text
  5. Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes

OpenClaw

  1. Set a session permission mode of guarded or workspace, or tools.exec.mode, before connecting mail. The default runs host commands without approval
  2. Turn on agents.defaults.sandbox for any agent that reads mail, web pages or attachments. Sandboxing is off by default
  3. Set tools.message.crossContext.allowAcrossProviders and allowWithinProvider to false to confine sends to the current conversation
  4. Route incoming mail to a restricted reader agent, as the IMAP and Gmail guides show, and deny gateway, cron, sessions_spawn and sessions_send for it
  5. Run openclaw security audit after setup, and treat the Gateway token as an owner credential. POST /tools/invoke accepts it with full operator access

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or OpenClaw?

OpenClaw scores 67.4 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.

Are LearnHarness and OpenClaw open source?

Yes. LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). OpenClaw is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with LearnHarness or OpenClaw

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.