Get an audit

Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run

Boski vs OpenClaw

OpenClaw scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Boski's 26.2 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do proactive personal assistants.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

BoskiBoski, Inc. · Platform F26.2/100#981 of 1010 OpenClawOpenClaw Foundation · Agent harness B67.1/100#270 of 1010

Which one, for what

Boski F

Best for People who want an agent working on personal goals between conversations, and who want ChatGPT or Codex to read their saved preferences.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where OpenClaw loses 8 points for them

Watch for

No free plan or trial found.

OpenClaw B

Best for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine across many chat apps, with their choice of model and files they can read and delete.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 75 against 25
  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 15
  • Agent ergonomics, 77 against 13
  • Security & auth, 74 against 45
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 10
  • Maintenance & community, 86 against 23
  • Transparency & trust, 68 against 63

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

Without configuration the default is full access. Host exec runs with no approval and sandboxing is off

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runBoskiOpenClawEdge
Reliability16%202575OpenClaw +50
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.21584OpenClaw +69
Agent ergonomics13%16.21377OpenClaw +64
Security & auth14%17.54574OpenClaw +29
Payments & pricing10%12.51060OpenClaw +50
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.82386OpenClaw +63
Transparency & trust7%8.86368OpenClaw +5
Negative events≤150-8
TotalF 26.2/100B 67.1/100

Facts side by side

FactBoskiOpenClaw
KindPlatformAgent harness
VendorBoski, Inc.OpenClaw Foundation
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFree
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Boski's Terms of Service (Boski, Inc., a Delaware corporation, effective 20 August 2026).MIT
Read-only variant documentedyesyes
llms.txtyesyes
Last releasenone2026-10-12
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularitynone392k stars

Verdicts

Boski

Boski is a hosted personal agent that works on its owner's goals over messaging channels for $5 a week, and its plugin lets ChatGPT and Codex read saved preferences under a read-only OAuth scope. No free option, status page or security contact was found, and the plugin's tool definitions weren't readable.

OpenClaw

Self-hosted under the MIT licence, with state, memory and credentials kept on the owner's machine and no paid tier. A fresh install runs tools on the host with full access, no approval prompt and no sandbox, and the project has published 722 security advisories since January 2026, 14 of them critical.

Before you call either

Boski

  1. Use the Boski plugin only to read the owner's saved preferences and constraints. It can't save changes.
  2. Ask the owner to finish Boski's onboarding interview if the plugin says it's incomplete, then retry.

OpenClaw

  1. Set a session permission mode of guarded or workspace, or tools.exec.mode, before connecting mail. The default runs host commands without approval
  2. Turn on agents.defaults.sandbox for any agent that reads mail, web pages or attachments. Sandboxing is off by default
  3. Set tools.message.crossContext.allowAcrossProviders and allowWithinProvider to false to confine sends to the current conversation
  4. Route incoming mail to a restricted reader agent, as the IMAP and Gmail guides show, and deny gateway, cron, sessions_spawn and sessions_send for it
  5. Run openclaw security audit after setup, and treat the Gateway token as an owner credential. POST /tools/invoke accepts it with full operator access

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Boski or OpenClaw?

OpenClaw scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Boski's 26.2 (F), and leads in every scored category.

Are Boski and OpenClaw open source?

No open-source release is listed for Boski. OpenClaw is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with Boski or OpenClaw

Disclosure

Boski competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report