Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Del vs LearnHarness
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Del's 20.5 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Del F
Best for People who want tasks, notes, reminders and Gmail handled by text on the channel they already use.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 56 against 25
- Schema & documentation, 63 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 60 against 0
- Security & auth, 52 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 71 against 60
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Del | LearnHarness | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 25 | 56 | LearnHarness +31 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 63 | LearnHarness +53 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 60 | LearnHarness +60 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 52 | LearnHarness +52 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 60 | LearnHarness +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 71 | LearnHarness +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 60 | LearnHarness +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 20.5/100 | C 59.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Del | LearnHarness |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Human Interface, Inc. | Amos Blomqvist |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Del's Terms of Service (Human Interface, Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 5 August 2026). | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-29 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-05 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-30 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 4.2k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Del
Del is a hosted texting assistant and task workspace across iMessage, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS, Discord and Slack, with a near-daily public changelog and a card-free 14-day trial. No outside agent can call it, no status page or security contact was found, and recent updates let some email actions skip approval.
LearnHarness
The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.
Before you call either
Del
- Don't plan to call Del from another agent. It answers only the owner's messaging threads and web workspace.
- Tell the owner web browsing tasks are limited to five a month on Standard and unlimited on Pro.
LearnHarness
- Use the bundled skill (
skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing - Pass
--format jsonbefore the subcommand, for examplepython3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions - Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
- Do not read
auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text - Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Del or LearnHarness?
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Del's 20.5 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are Del and LearnHarness open source?
No open-source release is listed for Del. LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only).
Other comparisons with Del or LearnHarness
- asaply vs Del
- Asmi vs Del
- AstrBot vs Del
- Boba vs Del
- Boski vs Del
- Brea vs Del
- Caddy vs Del
- CowAgent vs Del
- Del vs folk
- Del vs GAIA
- Del vs Grok Bot
- Del vs Haven
- Del vs Hermes Agent
- Del vs HireAlpha
- Del vs Instinct
- Del vs IronClaw
- Del vs Lindy
- Del vs nanobot
- Del vs NanoClaw
- Del vs Natura tinyNature
- Del vs Dots
- Del vs OpenClaw
- Del vs OpenDuet
- Del vs OpenInstinct
- Del vs Orbits
- Del vs Orchid
- Del vs Pally
- Del vs PicoClaw
- Del vs Poke
- Del vs QwenPaw
- Del vs szn
- Del vs Tab
- Del vs Tasker AI
- Del vs Tomo
- Del vs Town
- Del vs Zapia
- Del vs ZeroClaw
- Del vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs Del
- Atticus vs LearnHarness
- Boba vs LearnHarness
- Boski vs LearnHarness
- Brea vs LearnHarness
- Caddy vs LearnHarness
- Claude Duet vs LearnHarness
- CowAgent vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs Del
- DeepTutor vs LearnHarness
- Del vs Hark Pro
- Del vs Talorys
- folk vs LearnHarness
- GAIA vs LearnHarness
- Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness
- Grok Bot vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Haven vs LearnHarness
- Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness
- HireAlpha vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- IronClaw vs LearnHarness
- LearnHarness vs Leon
- LearnHarness vs Lindy
- LearnHarness vs Lobby
- LearnHarness vs nanobot
- LearnHarness vs NanoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature
- LearnHarness vs Dots
- LearnHarness vs OpenClaw
- LearnHarness vs OpenDuet
- LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Orchid
- LearnHarness vs Pally
- LearnHarness vs PicoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Poke
- LearnHarness vs QwenPaw
- LearnHarness vs szn
- LearnHarness vs Tab
- LearnHarness vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Tasker AI
- LearnHarness vs Tomo
- LearnHarness vs Town
- LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo)
- LearnHarness vs Zapia
- LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw
- LearnHarness vs Zo Computer
- Claude Duet vs Del
- Del vs Gemini Spark
- Del vs Leon
- Del vs Lobby
- Del vs Wajo (Fo)
- AstrBot vs LearnHarness
Disclosure
Del competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/del-vs-learnharness.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/del.json·/api/v1/tools/learnharness.json - From a terminal
anchor compare del learnharness(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "del", "b": "learnharness"}at/mcp, no key