Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run
Lobby vs QwenPaw
QwenPaw scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Lobby F
Best for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where QwenPaw loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
QwenPaw B
Best for One person who wants an assistant on Chinese and Western chat apps with scheduled digests, a consumer mailbox and file-based memory, on their own machine and with a model of their choice.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 68 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 0
- Security & auth, 60 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 73 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 56 against 43
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
Usage data is on by default, qwenpaw init --defaults accepts it without a prompt, and the opt-out variable is absent from the README and docs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Lobby | QwenPaw | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 70 | QwenPaw +55 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 68 | QwenPaw +58 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 67 | QwenPaw +67 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 60 | QwenPaw +60 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 60 | QwenPaw +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 2 | 73 | QwenPaw +71 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 43 | 56 | QwenPaw +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | F 11.1/100 | B 62.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Lobby | QwenPaw |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Lobby OS, Inc. | AgentScope |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | |
| Auth | OAuth | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026. | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | none | 36k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Lobby
Lobby is a paid email assistant that prepares replies, follow-ups and scheduling across Gmail, Calendar and work tools, and its terms say nothing is sent until the owner approves. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found on 21 October 2026.
QwenPaw
Mail tools ask for approval by default, automatic mail handling may not delete permanently, and the security docs list what each sandbox backend fails to enforce. Usage data is sent by default, the default approval level passes every tool call no rule flags, and no privacy policy or security advisory is published.
Before you call either
Lobby
- Don't plan to call Lobby from another agent. It works only inside its own app for the signed-in owner.
- Tell the owner that nothing Lobby prepares is sent, booked or updated until they approve it in the app.
- Check whether the 7-day trial takes a card before signing the owner up. The terms don't say.
QwenPaw
- Set
QWENPAW_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=truebeforeqwenpaw init --defaultsorqwenpaw app. Both send usage data without asking - Set
approval_leveltoSTRICTorSMARTinagent.json. The defaultAUTOruns every tool call no guard rule flags - Set
dm_policyandgroup_policytoallowlistwithallow_fromon each channel. Both default toopen - Set
QWENPAW_AUTH_ENABLED=truebefore binding beyond 127.0.0.1. Requests from localhost skip login even then - Keep mail tools on
askforsend_message,delete_messageanddelete_thread, and turn on Mail Access Control with automatic handling
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Lobby or QwenPaw?
QwenPaw scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are Lobby and QwenPaw open source?
No open-source release is listed for Lobby. QwenPaw is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Lobby or QwenPaw
- asaply vs QwenPaw
- Asmi vs QwenPaw
- Boba vs QwenPaw
- Brea vs QwenPaw
- Del vs QwenPaw
- HireAlpha vs QwenPaw
- OpenInstinct vs QwenPaw
- Orbits vs QwenPaw
- Orchid vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs szn
- QwenPaw vs Tab
- QwenPaw vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Lobby
- AstrBot vs QwenPaw
- Boski vs Lobby
- Boski vs QwenPaw
- Caddy vs Lobby
- Caddy vs QwenPaw
- CowAgent vs Lobby
- CowAgent vs QwenPaw
- folk vs Lobby
- folk vs QwenPaw
- GAIA vs Lobby
- GAIA vs QwenPaw
- Gemini Spark vs Lobby
- Gemini Spark vs QwenPaw
- Grok Bot vs Lobby
- Grok Bot vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs Lobby
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Hermes Agent vs Lobby
- Hermes Agent vs QwenPaw
- Instinct vs Lobby
- Instinct vs QwenPaw
- IronClaw vs Lobby
- IronClaw vs QwenPaw
- Leon vs Lobby
- Leon vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs Lobby
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- Lobby vs PicoClaw
- nanobot vs QwenPaw
- NanoClaw vs QwenPaw
- Dots vs QwenPaw
- OpenClaw vs QwenPaw
- PicoClaw vs QwenPaw
- Poke vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs Tasker AI
- QwenPaw vs Town
- QwenPaw vs ZeroClaw
- QwenPaw vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Lobby
- Brea vs Lobby
- Del vs Lobby
- HireAlpha vs Lobby
- Lobby vs nanobot
- Lobby vs NanoClaw
- Lobby vs Natura tinyNature
- Lobby vs Dots
- Lobby vs OpenClaw
- Lobby vs OpenInstinct
- Lobby vs Orbits
- Lobby vs Orchid
- Lobby vs Pally
- Lobby vs Poke
- Lobby vs szn
- Lobby vs Tasker AI
- Lobby vs Tomo
- Lobby vs Town
- Lobby vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Zapia
- Lobby vs ZeroClaw
- Lobby vs Zo Computer
- Natura tinyNature vs QwenPaw
- Pally vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs Tomo
- QwenPaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Asmi vs Lobby
- Atticus vs Lobby
- Atticus vs QwenPaw
- Boba vs Lobby
- Hark Pro vs Lobby
- Hark Pro vs QwenPaw
- Lobby vs Tab
- Lobby vs Talorys
- QwenPaw vs Talorys
Disclosure
Lobby competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lobby-os-vs-qwenpaw.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lobby-os.json·/api/v1/tools/qwenpaw.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lobby-os qwenpaw(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lobby-os", "b": "qwenpaw"}at/mcp, no key