Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
QwenPaw vs Zapia
QwenPaw scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Zapia's 17.3 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
QwenPaw B
Best for One person who wants an assistant on Chinese and Western chat apps with scheduled digests, a consumer mailbox and file-based memory, on their own machine and with a model of their choice.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 68 against 0
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 0
- Security & auth, 60 against 3
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 73 against 56
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
Usage data is on by default, qwenpaw init --defaults accepts it without a prompt, and the opt-out variable is absent from the README and docs
Zapia F
Best for Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking users who want an assistant over their mail, calendar, Drive and WhatsApp in an app.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where QwenPaw loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint, and the terms forbid unauthorised automated connections.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | QwenPaw | Zapia | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 15 | QwenPaw +55 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 68 | 0 | QwenPaw +68 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 0 | QwenPaw +67 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 3 | QwenPaw +57 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 30 | QwenPaw +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 73 | 56 | QwenPaw +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 59 | Zapia +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.2/100 | F 17.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | QwenPaw | Zapia |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Platform |
| Vendor | AgentScope | Brainlogic AI S.A.S. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Closed service under Zapia's terms and conditions (Brainlogic AI SAS). No date was found on the terms. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-10-12 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 36k stars | none |
Verdicts
QwenPaw
Mail tools ask for approval by default, automatic mail handling may not delete permanently, and the security docs list what each sandbox backend fails to enforce. Usage data is sent by default, the default approval level passes every tool call no rule flags, and no privacy policy or security advisory is published.
Zapia
Zapia is a personal assistant app for iOS, Android and the web with a free plan that isn't a trial, weekly iOS releases and explicit confirmation before anything that writes. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, security contact or hosting location was found.
Before you call either
QwenPaw
- Set
QWENPAW_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=truebeforeqwenpaw init --defaultsorqwenpaw app. Both send usage data without asking - Set
approval_leveltoSTRICTorSMARTinagent.json. The defaultAUTOruns every tool call no guard rule flags - Set
dm_policyandgroup_policytoallowlistwithallow_fromon each channel. Both default toopen - Set
QWENPAW_AUTH_ENABLED=truebefore binding beyond 127.0.0.1. Requests from localhost skip login even then - Keep mail tools on
askforsend_message,delete_messageanddelete_thread, and turn on Mail Access Control with automatic handling
Zapia
- Don't plan to call Zapia from another agent. It answers only in its own app and on the web, and the terms forbid unauthorised automated access.
- Tell the owner that Pro and Ultra trials become paid after 7 days unless cancelled in the app store.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, QwenPaw or Zapia?
QwenPaw scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Zapia's 17.3 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are QwenPaw and Zapia open source?
QwenPaw is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Zapia.
Other comparisons with QwenPaw or Zapia
- asaply vs QwenPaw
- asaply vs Zapia
- Asmi vs QwenPaw
- Asmi vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Zapia
- Boba vs QwenPaw
- Boba vs Zapia
- Boski vs Zapia
- Brea vs QwenPaw
- Brea vs Zapia
- Caddy vs Zapia
- CowAgent vs Zapia
- Del vs QwenPaw
- Del vs Zapia
- folk vs Zapia
- GAIA vs Zapia
- Grok Bot vs Zapia
- Haven vs Zapia
- Hermes Agent vs Zapia
- HireAlpha vs QwenPaw
- HireAlpha vs Zapia
- Instinct vs Zapia
- IronClaw vs Zapia
- Lindy vs Zapia
- nanobot vs Zapia
- NanoClaw vs Zapia
- Dots vs Zapia
- OpenClaw vs Zapia
- OpenInstinct vs QwenPaw
- OpenInstinct vs Zapia
- Orbits vs QwenPaw
- Orbits vs Zapia
- Orchid vs QwenPaw
- Orchid vs Zapia
- PicoClaw vs Zapia
- Poke vs Zapia
- QwenPaw vs szn
- QwenPaw vs Tab
- szn vs Zapia
- Tab vs Zapia
- Town vs Zapia
- Zapia vs ZeroClaw
- Zapia vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs QwenPaw
- Boski vs QwenPaw
- Caddy vs QwenPaw
- CowAgent vs QwenPaw
- folk vs QwenPaw
- GAIA vs QwenPaw
- Gemini Spark vs QwenPaw
- Grok Bot vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Hermes Agent vs QwenPaw
- Instinct vs QwenPaw
- IronClaw vs QwenPaw
- Leon vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- nanobot vs QwenPaw
- NanoClaw vs QwenPaw
- Dots vs QwenPaw
- OpenClaw vs QwenPaw
- PicoClaw vs QwenPaw
- Poke vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs Town
- QwenPaw vs ZeroClaw
- QwenPaw vs Zo Computer
- Gemini Spark vs Zapia
- Leon vs Zapia
- Natura tinyNature vs QwenPaw
- Natura tinyNature vs Zapia
- Pally vs QwenPaw
- Pally vs Zapia
- QwenPaw vs Tomo
- QwenPaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tomo vs Zapia
- Wajo (Fo) vs Zapia
- QwenPaw vs Talorys
- Talorys vs Zapia
Disclosure
Zapia competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/qwenpaw-vs-zapia.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/qwenpaw.json·/api/v1/tools/zapia.json - From a terminal
anchor compare qwenpaw zapia(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "qwenpaw", "b": "zapia"}at/mcp, no key