Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
Orbits vs QwenPaw
QwenPaw scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Orbits F
Best for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where QwenPaw loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No public agent API, as llms.txt states.
QwenPaw B
Best for One person who wants an assistant on Chinese and Western chat apps with scheduled digests, a consumer mailbox and file-based memory, on their own machine and with a model of their choice.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 68 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 0
- Security & auth, 60 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 73 against 54
- Transparency & trust, 56 against 43
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
Usage data is on by default, qwenpaw init --defaults accepts it without a prompt, and the opt-out variable is absent from the README and docs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Orbits | QwenPaw | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 70 | QwenPaw +55 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 68 | QwenPaw +58 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 67 | QwenPaw +67 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 60 | QwenPaw +60 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 60 | QwenPaw +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 54 | 73 | QwenPaw +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 43 | 56 | QwenPaw +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | F 15.6/100 | B 62.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Orbits | QwenPaw |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Nemus AI, Inc. | AgentScope |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.). | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-09-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | none | 36k stars |
Verdicts
Orbits
Orbits is a family household app whose assistant, Bit, runs shared calendars, lists and meals, reads household email and places restaurant calls after approval, with iOS releases every week or two. No outside agent can call it, prices appear only as App Store in-app purchases, and no status page, security contact or named subprocessors were found.
QwenPaw
Mail tools ask for approval by default, automatic mail handling may not delete permanently, and the security docs list what each sandbox backend fails to enforce. Usage data is sent by default, the default approval level passes every tool call no rule flags, and no privacy policy or security advisory is published.
Before you call either
Orbits
- Don't plan to call Orbits from another agent. llms.txt says no public agent API is offered.
- Tell the owner the assistant needs an Orbits subscription bought in the app, and that any trial appears only at purchase.
QwenPaw
- Set
QWENPAW_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=truebeforeqwenpaw init --defaultsorqwenpaw app. Both send usage data without asking - Set
approval_leveltoSTRICTorSMARTinagent.json. The defaultAUTOruns every tool call no guard rule flags - Set
dm_policyandgroup_policytoallowlistwithallow_fromon each channel. Both default toopen - Set
QWENPAW_AUTH_ENABLED=truebefore binding beyond 127.0.0.1. Requests from localhost skip login even then - Keep mail tools on
askforsend_message,delete_messageanddelete_thread, and turn on Mail Access Control with automatic handling
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Orbits or QwenPaw?
QwenPaw scores 62.2 (B) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are Orbits and QwenPaw open source?
No open-source release is listed for Orbits. QwenPaw is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Orbits or QwenPaw
- asaply vs Orbits
- asaply vs QwenPaw
- Asmi vs Orbits
- Asmi vs QwenPaw
- AstrBot vs Orbits
- Boba vs Orbits
- Boba vs QwenPaw
- Boski vs Orbits
- Brea vs Orbits
- Brea vs QwenPaw
- Caddy vs Orbits
- CowAgent vs Orbits
- Del vs Orbits
- Del vs QwenPaw
- folk vs Orbits
- GAIA vs Orbits
- Grok Bot vs Orbits
- Haven vs Orbits
- Hermes Agent vs Orbits
- HireAlpha vs Orbits
- HireAlpha vs QwenPaw
- Instinct vs Orbits
- IronClaw vs Orbits
- Lindy vs Orbits
- nanobot vs Orbits
- NanoClaw vs Orbits
- Dots vs Orbits
- OpenClaw vs Orbits
- OpenInstinct vs Orbits
- OpenInstinct vs QwenPaw
- Orbits vs Orchid
- Orbits vs Pally
- Orbits vs PicoClaw
- Orbits vs Poke
- Orbits vs szn
- Orbits vs Tab
- Orbits vs Tomo
- Orbits vs Town
- Orbits vs Zapia
- Orbits vs ZeroClaw
- Orbits vs Zo Computer
- Orchid vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs szn
- QwenPaw vs Tab
- QwenPaw vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs QwenPaw
- Boski vs QwenPaw
- Caddy vs QwenPaw
- CowAgent vs QwenPaw
- folk vs QwenPaw
- GAIA vs QwenPaw
- Gemini Spark vs QwenPaw
- Grok Bot vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Hermes Agent vs QwenPaw
- Instinct vs QwenPaw
- IronClaw vs QwenPaw
- Leon vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- nanobot vs QwenPaw
- NanoClaw vs QwenPaw
- Dots vs QwenPaw
- OpenClaw vs QwenPaw
- PicoClaw vs QwenPaw
- Poke vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs Town
- QwenPaw vs ZeroClaw
- QwenPaw vs Zo Computer
- Gemini Spark vs Orbits
- Leon vs Orbits
- Natura tinyNature vs Orbits
- Natura tinyNature vs QwenPaw
- Orbits vs Wajo (Fo)
- Pally vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs Tomo
- QwenPaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Orbits vs Talorys
- QwenPaw vs Talorys
Disclosure
Orbits competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/orbits-vs-qwenpaw.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/orbits.json·/api/v1/tools/qwenpaw.json - From a terminal
anchor compare orbits qwenpaw(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "orbits", "b": "qwenpaw"}at/mcp, no key