Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
Haven vs Orbits
Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Orbits leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Haven F
Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 15
- Agent ergonomics, 6 against 0
- Security & auth, 13 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
- Transparency & trust, 51 against 43
Watch for
No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.
Orbits F
Best for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 10 against 4
- Maintenance & community, 54 against 35
Watch for
No public agent API, as llms.txt states.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Haven | Orbits | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 15 | Haven +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 4 | 10 | Orbits +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 6 | 0 | Haven +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 13 | 0 | Haven +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 20 | Haven +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 35 | 54 | Orbits +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 43 | Haven +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 22.2/100 | F 15.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Haven | Orbits |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Hello Haven, Inc. | Nemus AI, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service | Closed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.). |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-10-13 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |
Verdicts
Haven
Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.
Orbits
Orbits is a family household app whose assistant, Bit, runs shared calendars, lists and meals, reads household email and places restaurant calls after approval, with iOS releases every week or two. No outside agent can call it, prices appear only as App Store in-app purchases, and no status page, security contact or named subprocessors were found.
Before you call either
Haven
- Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
- Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
- Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
- Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
- Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.
Orbits
- Don't plan to call Orbits from another agent. llms.txt says no public agent API is offered.
- Tell the owner the assistant needs an Orbits subscription bought in the app, and that any trial appears only at purchase.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Haven or Orbits?
Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Orbits leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community.
Other comparisons with Haven or Orbits
- asaply vs Haven
- asaply vs Orbits
- Asmi vs Haven
- Asmi vs Orbits
- AstrBot vs Orbits
- Boba vs Haven
- Boba vs Orbits
- Boski vs Orbits
- Brea vs Haven
- Brea vs Orbits
- Caddy vs Orbits
- CowAgent vs Orbits
- Del vs Haven
- Del vs Orbits
- folk vs Orbits
- GAIA vs Orbits
- Grok Bot vs Orbits
- Haven vs HireAlpha
- Haven vs OpenInstinct
- Haven vs Orchid
- Haven vs szn
- Haven vs Tab
- Haven vs Zapia
- Hermes Agent vs Orbits
- HireAlpha vs Orbits
- Instinct vs Orbits
- IronClaw vs Orbits
- Lindy vs Orbits
- nanobot vs Orbits
- NanoClaw vs Orbits
- Dots vs Orbits
- OpenClaw vs Orbits
- OpenInstinct vs Orbits
- Orbits vs Orchid
- Orbits vs Pally
- Orbits vs PicoClaw
- Orbits vs Poke
- Orbits vs QwenPaw
- Orbits vs szn
- Orbits vs Tab
- Orbits vs Tomo
- Orbits vs Town
- Orbits vs Zapia
- Orbits vs ZeroClaw
- Orbits vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs Haven
- Boski vs Haven
- Caddy vs Haven
- CowAgent vs Haven
- folk vs Haven
- GAIA vs Haven
- Gemini Spark vs Haven
- Grok Bot vs Haven
- Haven vs Hermes Agent
- Haven vs Instinct
- Haven vs IronClaw
- Haven vs Leon
- Haven vs Lindy
- Haven vs nanobot
- Haven vs NanoClaw
- Haven vs Dots
- Haven vs OpenClaw
- Haven vs PicoClaw
- Haven vs Poke
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs Town
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Haven vs Zo Computer
- Gemini Spark vs Orbits
- Haven vs Natura tinyNature
- Haven vs Pally
- Haven vs Tomo
- Haven vs Wajo (Fo)
- Leon vs Orbits
- Natura tinyNature vs Orbits
- Orbits vs Wajo (Fo)
- Haven vs Talorys
- Orbits vs Talorys
Disclosure
Orbits competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/haven-vs-orbits.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/haven.json·/api/v1/tools/orbits.json - From a terminal
anchor compare haven orbits(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "haven", "b": "orbits"}at/mcp, no key