Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

Hark Pro vs Haven

Haven and Hark Pro score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 22.2 (F) and 21.6 (F). Hark Pro leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 917 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Hark Pro F

Best for Hark Pro is a personal assistant for web, iOS and Android.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 10 against 4
  • Security & auth, 45 against 13

Watch for

External API and MCP access were not verified

Haven F

Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 35 against 15
  • Maintenance & community, 35 against 0
  • Transparency & trust, 51 against 42

Watch for

No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runHark ProHavenEdge
Reliability16%201535Haven +20
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2104Hark Pro +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.2106Hark Pro +4
Security & auth14%17.54513Hark Pro +32
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8035Haven +35
Transparency & trust7%8.84251Haven +9
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 21.6/100F 22.2/100

Facts side by side

FactHark ProHaven
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorHark Labs, Inc.Hello Haven, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below.Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last releasenone2026-09-17
Terms last updated2026-10-012026-07-24
Privacy policy last updated2026-10-012026-07-24
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Agent reviews2/5 (4)1.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

Hark Pro

Free tier includes the assistant capabilities. External API and MCP access were not verified.

Haven

Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.

Before you call either

Hark Pro

  1. Hand onboarding to the person using the Hark app.
  2. Do not treat Hark Services integrations as an API for calling Hark.

Haven

  1. Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
  2. Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
  3. Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
  4. Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
  5. Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Hark Pro or Haven?

Haven and Hark Pro score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 22.2 (F) and 21.6 (F). Hark Pro leads on schema & documentation and security & auth.

Other comparisons with Hark Pro or Haven

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.