Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Hark Pro vs Skydive
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Hark Pro's 21.9 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1245 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Hark Pro F
Best for Hark Pro is a personal assistant for web, iOS and Android.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Skydive loses 5 points for them
Watch for
External API and MCP access were not verified
Skydive D
Best for A person or team who wants hosted agents with their own cloud computers, memory and connected apps, reachable in Slack, email, text and a CLI, and who can drive them from scripts through the CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 41 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 59 against 10
- Security & auth, 59 against 45
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 56 against 0
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 46
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The API has no operation for sending an agent a task. That runs through the CLI's chat -p, outside the OpenAPI contract.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hark Pro | Skydive | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 41 | Skydive +26 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 81 | Skydive +71 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 10 | 59 | Skydive +49 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 45 | 59 | Skydive +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 35 | Skydive +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 0 | 56 | Skydive +56 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 46 | 75 | Skydive +29 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | F 21.9/100 | D 52.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hark Pro | Skydive |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Hark Labs, Inc. | Create, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.skydive.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below. | Closed service under the Skydive Terms of Service (Create, Inc.), effective 29 July 2026. The skydive-cli npm package is published under the MIT licence. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-08-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | none | 5.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Hark Pro
Free tier includes the assistant capabilities. External API and MCP access were not verified.
Skydive
Skydive publishes an OpenAPI 3.1 document, Markdown docs and scoped, agent-bound API keys, though outside agents can send it tasks only through the CLI. Its status page records several major incidents, including a 25-hour Agent Hosting outage, and its home and pricing pages say data is never used for training while the privacy policy turns training on by default.
Before you call either
Hark Pro
- Hand onboarding to the person using the Hark app.
- Do not treat Hark Services integrations as an API for calling Hark.
Skydive
- Send tasks with
skydive chat -p "..." --agent <id> --jsonand pass--conversation <id>from the JSON to keep context. The REST API can't send a task. - Don't retry
chat -por a create blindly after a timeout. There's no idempotency key, so list agents or keys before retrying. - Ask the owner for an agent-bound
usekey when you only need to read. Account-leveleditkeys can create agents and mint keys. - Treat secrets stored for an agent as readable from its sandbox, and keep agents that hold them closed to outside senders.
- Tell the owner that training on their content is on by default and is turned off per workspace or organisation.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Hark Pro or Skydive?
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Hark Pro's 21.9 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Hark Pro or Skydive
- asaply vs Skydive
- Asmi vs Skydive
- Boba vs Skydive
- Brea vs Skydive
- Del vs Skydive
- HireAlpha vs Skydive
- OpenInstinct vs Skydive
- Orbits vs Skydive
- Orchid vs Skydive
- AstrBot vs Skydive
- Boski vs Skydive
- Caddy vs Skydive
- Claude Duet vs Skydive
- CowAgent vs Skydive
- folk vs Skydive
- GAIA vs Skydive
- Gemini Spark vs Skydive
- Grok Bot vs Skydive
- Haven vs Skydive
- Hermes Agent vs Skydive
- Instinct vs Skydive
- IronClaw vs Skydive
- Leon vs Skydive
- Lindy vs Skydive
- nanobot vs Skydive
- NanoClaw vs Skydive
- Dots vs Skydive
- OpenClaw vs Skydive
- OpenDuet vs Skydive
- PicoClaw vs Skydive
- Poke vs Skydive
- QwenPaw vs Skydive
- asaply vs Hark Pro
- Asmi vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Skydive
- Boba vs Hark Pro
- Boski vs Hark Pro
- Brea vs Hark Pro
- Caddy vs Hark Pro
- Claude Duet vs Hark Pro
- CowAgent vs Hark Pro
- DeepTutor vs Hark Pro
- DeepTutor vs Skydive
- Del vs Hark Pro
- folk vs Hark Pro
- GAIA vs Hark Pro
- Gemini Spark vs Hark Pro
- Grok Bot vs Hark Pro
- Hark Pro vs Haven
- Hark Pro vs Hermes Agent
- Hark Pro vs HireAlpha
- Hark Pro vs Instinct
- Hark Pro vs IronClaw
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs Leon
- Hark Pro vs Lindy
- Hark Pro vs Lobby
- Hark Pro vs nanobot
- Hark Pro vs NanoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Natura tinyNature
- Hark Pro vs Dots
- Hark Pro vs OpenClaw
- Hark Pro vs OpenDuet
- Hark Pro vs OpenInstinct
- Hark Pro vs Orbits
- Hark Pro vs Orchid
- Hark Pro vs Pally
- Hark Pro vs PicoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Poke
- Hark Pro vs QwenPaw
- Hark Pro vs szn
- Hark Pro vs Tab
- Hark Pro vs Talorys
- Hark Pro vs Tasker AI
- Hark Pro vs Tomo
- Hark Pro vs Town
- Hark Pro vs Wajo (Fo)
- Hark Pro vs Zapia
- Hark Pro vs ZeroClaw
- Hark Pro vs Zo Computer
- LearnHarness vs Skydive
- Skydive vs szn
- Skydive vs Tab
- Skydive vs Talorys
- Skydive vs Tasker AI
- Skydive vs Tomo
- Skydive vs Town
- Skydive vs Wajo (Fo)
- Skydive vs Zapia
- Skydive vs ZeroClaw
- Skydive vs Zo Computer
- Lobby vs Skydive
- Natura tinyNature vs Skydive
- Pally vs Skydive
Disclosure
Skydive competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hark-pro-vs-skydive.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hark-pro.json·/api/v1/tools/skydive.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hark-pro skydive(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hark-pro", "b": "skydive"}at/mcp, no key