Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

LearnHarness vs Skydive

LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Skydive's 52.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Skydive leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1245 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

LearnHarness C

Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 56 against 41
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 35
  • Maintenance & community, 71 against 56

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source
  • No incidents deducted, where Skydive loses 5 points for them

Watch for

The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider

Skydive D

Best for A person or team who wants hosted agents with their own cloud computers, memory and connected apps, reachable in Slack, email, text and a CLI, and who can drive them from scripts through the CLI.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 81 against 63
  • Security & auth, 59 against 52
  • Transparency & trust, 75 against 60

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

The API has no operation for sending an agent a task. That runs through the CLI's chat -p, outside the OpenAPI contract.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLearnHarnessSkydiveEdge
Reliability16%205641LearnHarness +15
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26381Skydive +18
Agent ergonomics13%16.26059LearnHarness +1
Security & auth14%17.55259Skydive +7
Payments & pricing10%12.56035LearnHarness +25
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87156LearnHarness +15
Transparency & trust7%8.86075Skydive +15
Negative events≤150-5
TotalC 59.3/100D 52.1/100

Facts side by side

FactLearnHarnessSkydive
KindAgent harnessPlatform
VendorAmos BlomqvistCreate, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.skydive.com/v1
TransportsHTTP
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceAGPL-3.0-onlyClosed service under the Skydive Terms of Service (Create, Inc.), effective 29 July 2026. The skydive-cli npm package is published under the MIT licence.
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-292026-08-26
Terms last updatedno date givencouldn't be read
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedcouldn't be read
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textcouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textcouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textcouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textcouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textcouldn't be read
Popularity4.2k stars5.5k npm/wk

Verdicts

LearnHarness

The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.

Skydive

Skydive publishes an OpenAPI 3.1 document, Markdown docs and scoped, agent-bound API keys, though outside agents can send it tasks only through the CLI. Its status page records several major incidents, including a 25-hour Agent Hosting outage, and its home and pricing pages say data is never used for training while the privacy policy turns training on by default.

Before you call either

LearnHarness

  1. Use the bundled skill (skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing
  2. Pass --format json before the subcommand, for example python3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions
  3. Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
  4. Do not read auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text
  5. Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes

Skydive

  1. Send tasks with skydive chat -p "..." --agent <id> --json and pass --conversation <id> from the JSON to keep context. The REST API can't send a task.
  2. Don't retry chat -p or a create blindly after a timeout. There's no idempotency key, so list agents or keys before retrying.
  3. Ask the owner for an agent-bound use key when you only need to read. Account-level edit keys can create agents and mint keys.
  4. Treat secrets stored for an agent as readable from its sandbox, and keep agents that hold them closed to outside senders.
  5. Tell the owner that training on their content is on by default and is turned off per workspace or organisation.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or Skydive?

LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Skydive's 52.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Skydive leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust.

Are LearnHarness and Skydive open source?

LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). No open-source release is listed for Skydive.

Other comparisons with LearnHarness or Skydive

Disclosure

Skydive competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.