Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
LearnHarness vs Skydive
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Skydive's 52.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Skydive leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1245 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 56 against 41
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 71 against 56
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where Skydive loses 5 points for them
Watch for
The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
Skydive D
Best for A person or team who wants hosted agents with their own cloud computers, memory and connected apps, reachable in Slack, email, text and a CLI, and who can drive them from scripts through the CLI.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 63
- Security & auth, 59 against 52
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 60
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
The API has no operation for sending an agent a task. That runs through the CLI's chat -p, outside the OpenAPI contract.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LearnHarness | Skydive | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 56 | 41 | LearnHarness +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 63 | 81 | Skydive +18 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 60 | 59 | LearnHarness +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 59 | Skydive +7 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 35 | LearnHarness +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 71 | 56 | LearnHarness +15 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 75 | Skydive +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | C 59.3/100 | D 52.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LearnHarness | Skydive |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Platform |
| Vendor | Amos Blomqvist | Create, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.skydive.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0-only | Closed service under the Skydive Terms of Service (Create, Inc.), effective 29 July 2026. The skydive-cli npm package is published under the MIT licence. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-29 | 2026-08-26 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 4.2k stars | 5.5k npm/wk |
Verdicts
LearnHarness
The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.
Skydive
Skydive publishes an OpenAPI 3.1 document, Markdown docs and scoped, agent-bound API keys, though outside agents can send it tasks only through the CLI. Its status page records several major incidents, including a 25-hour Agent Hosting outage, and its home and pricing pages say data is never used for training while the privacy policy turns training on by default.
Before you call either
LearnHarness
- Use the bundled skill (
skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing - Pass
--format jsonbefore the subcommand, for examplepython3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions - Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
- Do not read
auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text - Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes
Skydive
- Send tasks with
skydive chat -p "..." --agent <id> --jsonand pass--conversation <id>from the JSON to keep context. The REST API can't send a task. - Don't retry
chat -por a create blindly after a timeout. There's no idempotency key, so list agents or keys before retrying. - Ask the owner for an agent-bound
usekey when you only need to read. Account-leveleditkeys can create agents and mint keys. - Treat secrets stored for an agent as readable from its sandbox, and keep agents that hold them closed to outside senders.
- Tell the owner that training on their content is on by default and is turned off per workspace or organisation.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or Skydive?
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Skydive's 52.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Skydive leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust.
Are LearnHarness and Skydive open source?
LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). No open-source release is listed for Skydive.
Other comparisons with LearnHarness or Skydive
- asaply vs Skydive
- Asmi vs Skydive
- Boba vs Skydive
- Brea vs Skydive
- Del vs Skydive
- HireAlpha vs Skydive
- OpenInstinct vs Skydive
- Orbits vs Skydive
- Orchid vs Skydive
- AstrBot vs Skydive
- Boski vs Skydive
- Caddy vs Skydive
- Claude Duet vs Skydive
- CowAgent vs Skydive
- folk vs Skydive
- GAIA vs Skydive
- Gemini Spark vs Skydive
- Grok Bot vs Skydive
- Haven vs Skydive
- Hermes Agent vs Skydive
- Instinct vs Skydive
- IronClaw vs Skydive
- Leon vs Skydive
- Lindy vs Skydive
- nanobot vs Skydive
- NanoClaw vs Skydive
- Dots vs Skydive
- OpenClaw vs Skydive
- OpenDuet vs Skydive
- PicoClaw vs Skydive
- Poke vs Skydive
- QwenPaw vs Skydive
- asaply vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs Skydive
- Boba vs LearnHarness
- Boski vs LearnHarness
- Brea vs LearnHarness
- Caddy vs LearnHarness
- Claude Duet vs LearnHarness
- CowAgent vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs Skydive
- Del vs LearnHarness
- folk vs LearnHarness
- GAIA vs LearnHarness
- Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness
- Grok Bot vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs Skydive
- Haven vs LearnHarness
- Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness
- HireAlpha vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- IronClaw vs LearnHarness
- LearnHarness vs Leon
- LearnHarness vs Lindy
- LearnHarness vs Lobby
- LearnHarness vs nanobot
- LearnHarness vs NanoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature
- LearnHarness vs Dots
- LearnHarness vs OpenClaw
- LearnHarness vs OpenDuet
- LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Orchid
- LearnHarness vs Pally
- LearnHarness vs PicoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Poke
- LearnHarness vs QwenPaw
- LearnHarness vs szn
- LearnHarness vs Tab
- LearnHarness vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Tasker AI
- LearnHarness vs Tomo
- LearnHarness vs Town
- LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo)
- LearnHarness vs Zapia
- LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw
- LearnHarness vs Zo Computer
- Skydive vs szn
- Skydive vs Tab
- Skydive vs Talorys
- Skydive vs Tasker AI
- Skydive vs Tomo
- Skydive vs Town
- Skydive vs Wajo (Fo)
- Skydive vs Zapia
- Skydive vs ZeroClaw
- Skydive vs Zo Computer
- Lobby vs Skydive
- Natura tinyNature vs Skydive
- Pally vs Skydive
- AstrBot vs LearnHarness
Disclosure
Skydive competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/learnharness-vs-skydive.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/learnharness.json·/api/v1/tools/skydive.json - From a terminal
anchor compare learnharness skydive(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "learnharness", "b": "skydive"}at/mcp, no key