Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Caddy vs Hark Pro
Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Caddy's 16.7 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Caddy leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 917 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Caddy F
Best for People who want a free assistant in iMessage or RCS that watches mail, calendars and work tools and asks before acting.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 55 against 0
- Transparency & trust, 52 against 42
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Hark Pro F
Best for Hark Pro is a personal assistant for web, iOS and Android.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 15 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 10 against 0
- Security & auth, 45 against 0
Watch for
External API and MCP access were not verified
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Caddy | Hark Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 10 | 15 | Hark Pro +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 10 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 10 | Hark Pro +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 45 | Hark Pro +45 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 55 | 0 | Caddy +55 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 52 | 42 | Caddy +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 16.7/100 | F 21.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Caddy | Hark Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Caddy Technologies Inc. | Hark Labs, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Caddy's Terms of Service (Caddy Technologies Inc., last updated 27 April 2026). | Proprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below. |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-13 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Caddy
Caddy is a free iMessage and RCS assistant in public beta that watches connected mail, calendars and work apps and asks before sending email or changing data. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found, though its iOS app ships every week or two.
Hark Pro
Free tier includes the assistant capabilities. External API and MCP access were not verified.
Before you call either
Caddy
- Don't plan to call Caddy from another agent. It answers the owner's text messages, Siri and group chats it's added to.
- Expect Caddy to ask the owner before it sends email or creates an invite.
Hark Pro
- Hand onboarding to the person using the Hark app.
- Do not treat Hark Services integrations as an API for calling Hark.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Caddy or Hark Pro?
Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Caddy's 16.7 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Caddy leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Other comparisons with Caddy or Hark Pro
- asaply vs Caddy
- Asmi vs Caddy
- Boba vs Caddy
- Brea vs Caddy
- Caddy vs Del
- Caddy vs HireAlpha
- Caddy vs OpenInstinct
- Caddy vs Orbits
- Caddy vs Orchid
- Caddy vs szn
- Caddy vs Tab
- Caddy vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Caddy
- Boski vs Caddy
- Caddy vs CowAgent
- Caddy vs folk
- Caddy vs GAIA
- Caddy vs Gemini Spark
- Caddy vs Grok Bot
- Caddy vs Haven
- Caddy vs Hermes Agent
- Caddy vs Instinct
- Caddy vs IronClaw
- Caddy vs Leon
- Caddy vs Lindy
- Caddy vs nanobot
- Caddy vs NanoClaw
- Caddy vs Dots
- Caddy vs OpenClaw
- Caddy vs PicoClaw
- Caddy vs Poke
- Caddy vs QwenPaw
- Caddy vs Town
- Caddy vs ZeroClaw
- Caddy vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Hark Pro
- Asmi vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Caddy
- Atticus vs Hark Pro
- Boba vs Hark Pro
- Boski vs Hark Pro
- Brea vs Hark Pro
- Caddy vs Talorys
- CowAgent vs Hark Pro
- Del vs Hark Pro
- folk vs Hark Pro
- GAIA vs Hark Pro
- Gemini Spark vs Hark Pro
- Grok Bot vs Hark Pro
- Hark Pro vs Haven
- Hark Pro vs Hermes Agent
- Hark Pro vs HireAlpha
- Hark Pro vs Instinct
- Hark Pro vs IronClaw
- Hark Pro vs Leon
- Hark Pro vs Lindy
- Hark Pro vs nanobot
- Hark Pro vs NanoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Natura tinyNature
- Hark Pro vs Dots
- Hark Pro vs OpenClaw
- Hark Pro vs OpenInstinct
- Hark Pro vs Orbits
- Hark Pro vs Orchid
- Hark Pro vs Pally
- Hark Pro vs PicoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Poke
- Hark Pro vs QwenPaw
- Hark Pro vs szn
- Hark Pro vs Tab
- Hark Pro vs Talorys
- Hark Pro vs Tomo
- Hark Pro vs Town
- Hark Pro vs Wajo (Fo)
- Hark Pro vs Zapia
- Hark Pro vs ZeroClaw
- Hark Pro vs Zo Computer
- Caddy vs Natura tinyNature
- Caddy vs Pally
- Caddy vs Tomo
- Caddy vs Wajo (Fo)
Disclosure
Caddy competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/caddy-app-vs-hark-pro.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/caddy-app.json·/api/v1/tools/hark-pro.json - From a terminal
anchor compare caddy-app hark-pro(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "caddy-app", "b": "hark-pro"}at/mcp, no key