Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Hark Pro vs Zapia
Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Zapia's 17.3 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Zapia leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 917 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Hark Pro F
Best for Hark Pro is a personal assistant for web, iOS and Android.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 10 against 0
- Agent ergonomics, 10 against 0
- Security & auth, 45 against 3
Watch for
External API and MCP access were not verified
Zapia F
Best for Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking users who want an assistant over their mail, calendar, Drive and WhatsApp in an app.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 56 against 0
- Transparency & trust, 59 against 42
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint, and the terms forbid unauthorised automated connections.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hark Pro | Zapia | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 15 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 0 | Hark Pro +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 10 | 0 | Hark Pro +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 45 | 3 | Hark Pro +42 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 0 | 56 | Zapia +56 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 42 | 59 | Zapia +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 21.6/100 | F 17.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hark Pro | Zapia |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Hark Labs, Inc. | Brainlogic AI S.A.S. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below. | Closed service under Zapia's terms and conditions (Brainlogic AI SAS). No date was found on the terms. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-12 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Hark Pro
Free tier includes the assistant capabilities. External API and MCP access were not verified.
Zapia
Zapia is a personal assistant app for iOS, Android and the web with a free plan that isn't a trial, weekly iOS releases and explicit confirmation before anything that writes. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, security contact or hosting location was found.
Before you call either
Hark Pro
- Hand onboarding to the person using the Hark app.
- Do not treat Hark Services integrations as an API for calling Hark.
Zapia
- Don't plan to call Zapia from another agent. It answers only in its own app and on the web, and the terms forbid unauthorised automated access.
- Tell the owner that Pro and Ultra trials become paid after 7 days unless cancelled in the app store.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Hark Pro or Zapia?
Hark Pro scores 21.6 (F) on agent readiness against Zapia's 17.3 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Zapia leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Other comparisons with Hark Pro or Zapia
- asaply vs Zapia
- Asmi vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Zapia
- Boba vs Zapia
- Boski vs Zapia
- Brea vs Zapia
- Caddy vs Zapia
- CowAgent vs Zapia
- Del vs Zapia
- folk vs Zapia
- GAIA vs Zapia
- Grok Bot vs Zapia
- Haven vs Zapia
- Hermes Agent vs Zapia
- HireAlpha vs Zapia
- Instinct vs Zapia
- IronClaw vs Zapia
- Lindy vs Zapia
- nanobot vs Zapia
- NanoClaw vs Zapia
- Dots vs Zapia
- OpenClaw vs Zapia
- OpenInstinct vs Zapia
- Orbits vs Zapia
- Orchid vs Zapia
- PicoClaw vs Zapia
- Poke vs Zapia
- QwenPaw vs Zapia
- szn vs Zapia
- Tab vs Zapia
- Town vs Zapia
- Zapia vs ZeroClaw
- Zapia vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Hark Pro
- Asmi vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Hark Pro
- Atticus vs Zapia
- Boba vs Hark Pro
- Boski vs Hark Pro
- Brea vs Hark Pro
- Caddy vs Hark Pro
- CowAgent vs Hark Pro
- Del vs Hark Pro
- folk vs Hark Pro
- GAIA vs Hark Pro
- Gemini Spark vs Hark Pro
- Grok Bot vs Hark Pro
- Hark Pro vs Haven
- Hark Pro vs Hermes Agent
- Hark Pro vs HireAlpha
- Hark Pro vs Instinct
- Hark Pro vs IronClaw
- Hark Pro vs Leon
- Hark Pro vs Lindy
- Hark Pro vs nanobot
- Hark Pro vs NanoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Natura tinyNature
- Hark Pro vs Dots
- Hark Pro vs OpenClaw
- Hark Pro vs OpenInstinct
- Hark Pro vs Orbits
- Hark Pro vs Orchid
- Hark Pro vs Pally
- Hark Pro vs PicoClaw
- Hark Pro vs Poke
- Hark Pro vs QwenPaw
- Hark Pro vs szn
- Hark Pro vs Tab
- Hark Pro vs Talorys
- Hark Pro vs Tomo
- Hark Pro vs Town
- Hark Pro vs Wajo (Fo)
- Hark Pro vs ZeroClaw
- Hark Pro vs Zo Computer
- Talorys vs Zapia
- Gemini Spark vs Zapia
- Leon vs Zapia
- Natura tinyNature vs Zapia
- Pally vs Zapia
- Tomo vs Zapia
- Wajo (Fo) vs Zapia
Disclosure
Zapia competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hark-pro-vs-zapia.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hark-pro.json·/api/v1/tools/zapia.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hark-pro zapia(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hark-pro", "b": "zapia"}at/mcp, no key