Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run

Lobby vs Tasker AI

Lobby scores 11.1 (F) on agent readiness against Tasker AI's 7.6 (F), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Lobby F

Best for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 10 against 0

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.0 against 1.5 out of 5

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Tasker AI F

Best for A person or small team who wants an assistant in Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS or email that runs recurring tasks across connected apps.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

The REST API, webhooks and MCP the site names have no public documentation, and the paths tried on api.tasker.ai answered 404.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLobbyTasker AIEdge
Reliability16%201515even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2100Lobby +10
Agent ergonomics13%16.200even
Security & auth14%17.500even
Payments & pricing10%12.52020even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.822even
Transparency & trust7%8.84345Tasker AI +2
Negative events≤150-2
TotalF 11.1/100F 7.6/100

Facts side by side

FactLobbyTasker AI
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorLobby OS, Inc.DAPI, Inc. (dba Tasker AI)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuthOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026.Closed service under the Master Service Agreement of DAPI, Inc. doing business as Tasker AI, last updated 21 June 2026. The site says Tasker is open source; no public repository was found.
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updated
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2/5 (4)1.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Lobby

Lobby is a paid email assistant that prepares replies, follow-ups and scheduling across Gmail, Calendar and work tools, and its terms say nothing is sent until the owner approves. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found on 21 October 2026.

Tasker AI

Tasker AI is a freemium hosted assistant reached in Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS and email, with public plan prices from US$0. Its API, MCP and open-source claims couldn't be confirmed on 21 October 2026. No API documentation was found, and the npm package its API page tells developers to install doesn't exist.

Before you call either

Lobby

  1. Don't plan to call Lobby from another agent. It works only inside its own app for the signed-in owner.
  2. Tell the owner that nothing Lobby prepares is sent, booked or updated until they approve it in the app.
  3. Check whether the 7-day trial takes a card before signing the owner up. The terms don't say.

Tasker AI

  1. Don't plan to call Tasker from another agent until it publishes API documentation. GET api.tasker.ai/v1/tasks returned 404.
  2. Don't run npx create-tasker@latest. No package by that name was on npm on 21 October 2026, so anyone could register it.
  3. Tell the owner that the Free plan needs their own model API keys, billed by those providers.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Lobby or Tasker AI?

Lobby scores 11.1 (F) on agent readiness against Tasker AI's 7.6 (F), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories.

Other comparisons with Lobby or Tasker AI

Disclosure

Lobby competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Tasker AI competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.