Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run
Lindy vs Lobby
Lindy scores 32.3 (F) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do proactive personal assistants.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Lindy F
Best for Lindy suits a person or small team that lives in Slack and Google or Microsoft mail and wants briefs, drafts, scheduling and meeting notes done on a schedule.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 24 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 32 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 43 against 0
- Security & auth, 49 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 9 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 52 against 43
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The integrations page says approval settings apply in shared Slack threads only. Web chat, Slack direct messages, iMessage and SMS are not covered, and reads are never covered.
Lobby F
Best for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Lindy loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Lindy | Lobby | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 24 | 15 | Lindy +9 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 32 | 10 | Lindy +22 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 43 | 0 | Lindy +43 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 49 | 0 | Lindy +49 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 20 | Lindy +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 9 | 2 | Lindy +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 52 | 43 | Lindy +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | F 32.3/100 | F 11.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Lindy | Lobby |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Crivello Corp (doing business as Lindy) | Lobby OS, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Lindy's Terms of Service. No source is published | Closed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2025-10-21 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-24 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-28 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Lindy
Lindy keeps what it remembers in files the owner can read and edit, and publishes credit prices. Its approval setting applies in shared Slack threads only, so writes asked for by direct message, text or web chat run unasked, which its pricing page does not say. It has no status page, and its changelog stops in October 2025.
Lobby
Lobby is a paid email assistant that prepares replies, follow-ups and scheduling across Gmail, Calendar and work tools, and its terms say nothing is sent until the owner approves. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found on 21 October 2026.
Before you call either
Lindy
- Treat a request sent by direct message, text or web chat as unguarded. Approval prompts appear in shared Slack threads only.
- Run a routine as a dry run before turning it on. A dry run reads real data and sends, posts and writes nothing.
- Turn off unused tools after adding an MCP server. Every supported tool arrives switched on, and a large server adds more than a hundred.
- Expect a billed seat for anyone who mentions Lindy in Slack. A teammate who joins that way has seven free days first.
- Connect only hosted MCP servers on public HTTPS with streamable HTTP, the one kind the docs describe.
Lobby
- Don't plan to call Lobby from another agent. It works only inside its own app for the signed-in owner.
- Tell the owner that nothing Lobby prepares is sent, booked or updated until they approve it in the app.
- Check whether the 7-day trial takes a card before signing the owner up. The terms don't say.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Lindy or Lobby?
Lindy scores 32.3 (F) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Lindy or Lobby
- asaply vs Lindy
- Asmi vs Lindy
- Boba vs Lindy
- Brea vs Lindy
- Del vs Lindy
- HireAlpha vs Lindy
- Lindy vs OpenInstinct
- Lindy vs Orbits
- Lindy vs Orchid
- Lindy vs szn
- Lindy vs Tab
- Lindy vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Lindy
- AstrBot vs Lobby
- Boski vs Lindy
- Boski vs Lobby
- Caddy vs Lindy
- Caddy vs Lobby
- CowAgent vs Lindy
- CowAgent vs Lobby
- folk vs Lindy
- folk vs Lobby
- GAIA vs Lindy
- GAIA vs Lobby
- Gemini Spark vs Lindy
- Gemini Spark vs Lobby
- Grok Bot vs Lindy
- Grok Bot vs Lobby
- Haven vs Lindy
- Haven vs Lobby
- Hermes Agent vs Lindy
- Hermes Agent vs Lobby
- Instinct vs Lindy
- Instinct vs Lobby
- IronClaw vs Lindy
- IronClaw vs Lobby
- Leon vs Lindy
- Leon vs Lobby
- Lindy vs nanobot
- Lindy vs NanoClaw
- Lindy vs Dots
- Lindy vs OpenClaw
- Lindy vs PicoClaw
- Lindy vs Poke
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs Tasker AI
- Lindy vs Town
- Lindy vs ZeroClaw
- Lindy vs Zo Computer
- Lobby vs PicoClaw
- asaply vs Lobby
- Brea vs Lobby
- Del vs Lobby
- HireAlpha vs Lobby
- Lindy vs Natura tinyNature
- Lindy vs Pally
- Lindy vs Tomo
- Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs nanobot
- Lobby vs NanoClaw
- Lobby vs Natura tinyNature
- Lobby vs Dots
- Lobby vs OpenClaw
- Lobby vs OpenInstinct
- Lobby vs Orbits
- Lobby vs Orchid
- Lobby vs Pally
- Lobby vs Poke
- Lobby vs QwenPaw
- Lobby vs szn
- Lobby vs Tasker AI
- Lobby vs Tomo
- Lobby vs Town
- Lobby vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Zapia
- Lobby vs ZeroClaw
- Lobby vs Zo Computer
- Asmi vs Lobby
- Atticus vs Lindy
- Atticus vs Lobby
- Boba vs Lobby
- Hark Pro vs Lindy
- Hark Pro vs Lobby
- Lindy vs Talorys
- Lobby vs Tab
- Lobby vs Talorys
Disclosure
Lobby competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lindy-vs-lobby-os.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lindy.json·/api/v1/tools/lobby-os.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lindy lobby-os(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lindy", "b": "lobby-os"}at/mcp, no key