Get an audit

Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run

Grok Bot vs Lindy

Grok Bot scores 45.2 (E) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.3 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Lindy leads on payments & pricing. Both do assistant proactive.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons

Grok BotSpaceXAI and Cursor (Anysphere, Inc.) · Platform E45.2/100#893 of 986 LindyCrivello Corp (doing business as Lindy) · Platform F32.3/100#968 of 986

Which one, for what

Grok Bot E

Best for A person or team already paying for Cursor or SuperGrok who wants named assistants that keep working on a cloud computer, with routines and Slack or X entry points, and who will write approval rules.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 40 against 24
  • Schema & documentation, 40 against 32
  • Agent ergonomics, 50 against 43
  • Security & auth, 68 against 49
  • Maintenance & community, 20 against 9
  • Transparency & trust, 66 against 52

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where Lindy loses 3 points for them

Watch for

All of one user's Bots share one cloud computer, with its files, browser sessions and command-line credentials. The docs say separate Bots are not a security boundary

Lindy F

Best for Lindy suits a person or small team that lives in Slack and Google or Microsoft mail and wants briefs, drafts, scheduling and meeting notes done on a schedule.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 35 against 25

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

The integrations page says approval settings apply in shared Slack threads only. Web chat, Slack direct messages, iMessage and SMS are not covered, and reads are never covered.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runGrok BotLindyEdge
Reliability16%204024Grok Bot +16
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24032Grok Bot +8
Agent ergonomics13%16.25043Grok Bot +7
Security & auth14%17.56849Grok Bot +19
Payments & pricing10%12.52535Lindy +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8209Grok Bot +11
Transparency & trust7%8.86652Grok Bot +14
Negative events≤150-3
TotalE 45.2/100F 32.3/100

Facts side by side

FactGrok BotLindy
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorSpaceXAI and Cursor (Anysphere, Inc.)Crivello Corp (doing business as Lindy)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceProprietaryProprietary service under Lindy's Terms of Service. No source is published
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last releasenone2025-10-21
Terms last updated2026-09-032026-09-24
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-292026-09-28
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textyes

Verdicts

Grok Bot

Connector tokens stay on Cursor's backend and each user gets a separate microVM, with approvals, drafts and a review model before risky actions. All of a user's Bots share one computer and its sign-ins, the review model skips memory writes, and the status page shows seven major Grok Bot incidents since 3 September 2026.

Lindy

Lindy keeps what it remembers in files the owner can read and edit, and publishes credit prices. Its approval setting applies in shared Slack threads only, so writes asked for by direct message, text or web chat run unasked, which its pricing page does not say. It has no status page, and its changelog stops in October 2025.

Before you call either

Grok Bot

  1. State in each request what the Bot may change and where it must stop. Which actions pause for approval depends on the tool, the risk and the owner's Auto-review rules
  2. Add narrow Ask first rules for sending, publishing, purchasing and deleting. Ask first wins over Allow automatically when both match
  3. Treat any sign-in or file on the cloud computer as available to every Bot on the account. Give a workload its own Cursor user when it needs separate credentials
  4. Run Test run with safe inputs. A test run performs real work and can call connected tools
  5. To remove access, pause routines, sign out of sites on the computer, uninstall connectors and revoke them at the source service. Deleting the Bot is not enough

Lindy

  1. Treat a request sent by direct message, text or web chat as unguarded. Approval prompts appear in shared Slack threads only.
  2. Run a routine as a dry run before turning it on. A dry run reads real data and sends, posts and writes nothing.
  3. Turn off unused tools after adding an MCP server. Every supported tool arrives switched on, and a large server adds more than a hundred.
  4. Expect a billed seat for anyone who mentions Lindy in Slack. A teammate who joins that way has seven free days first.
  5. Connect only hosted MCP servers on public HTTPS with streamable HTTP, the one kind the docs describe.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Grok Bot or Lindy?

Grok Bot scores 45.2 (E) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.3 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Lindy leads on payments & pricing.

Other comparisons with Grok Bot or Lindy

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report