Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run
Grok Bot vs ZeroClaw
ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Grok Bot's 45.2 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistant proactive.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Grok Bot E
Best for A person or team already paying for Cursor or SuperGrok who wants named assistants that keep working on a cloud computer, with routines and Slack or X entry points, and who will write approval rules.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where ZeroClaw loses 3 points for them
Watch for
All of one user's Bots share one cloud computer, with its files, browser sessions and command-line credentials. The docs say separate Bots are not a security boundary
ZeroClaw BB
Best for One person who wants an assistant on their own hardware that answers on Telegram, Discord, Matrix or email, asks before it writes or runs commands, and works with a local model.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 74 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 82 against 40
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 50
- Security & auth, 76 against 68
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 25
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 20
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
The docs state that command execution is not audited. [security.audit] records certificate events only, and tool receipts are opt-in and not durable
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Grok Bot | ZeroClaw | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 74 | ZeroClaw +34 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 40 | 82 | ZeroClaw +42 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 50 | 72 | ZeroClaw +22 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 68 | 76 | ZeroClaw +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 25 | 60 | ZeroClaw +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 20 | 80 | ZeroClaw +60 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 66 | 64 | Grok Bot +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | E 45.2/100 | BB 70.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Grok Bot | ZeroClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | SpaceXAI and Cursor (Anysphere, Inc.) | ZeroClaw Labs |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-03 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-29 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | none | 33k stars |
Verdicts
Grok Bot
Connector tokens stay on Cursor's backend and each user gets a separate microVM, with approvals, drafts and a review model before risky actions. All of a user's Bots share one computer and its sign-ins, the review model skips memory writes, and the status page shows seven major Grok Bot incidents since 3 September 2026.
ZeroClaw
Supervised autonomy is the default, so tools outside a short read-only list wait for the owner's approval, and secrets are encrypted in the config file. The docs state that command execution is not written to an audit log, and the project publishes no privacy policy or terms.
Before you call either
Grok Bot
- State in each request what the Bot may change and where it must stop. Which actions pause for approval depends on the tool, the risk and the owner's Auto-review rules
- Add narrow Ask first rules for sending, publishing, purchasing and deleting. Ask first wins over Allow automatically when both match
- Treat any sign-in or file on the cloud computer as available to every Bot on the account. Give a workload its own Cursor user when it needs separate credentials
- Run Test run with safe inputs. A test run performs real work and can call connected tools
- To remove access, pause routines, sign out of sites on the computer, uninstall connectors and revoke them at the source service. Deleting the Bot is not enough
ZeroClaw
- Keep
[risk_profiles.<alias>] level = "supervised".fullruns every tool not listed inalways_ask, and the YOLO preset removes the sandbox and path rules too - Add sending and account tools such as
send_via,google_workspaceandhttp_requesttoalways_askso a session-level Always grant cannot skip the prompt - List senders in
[peer_groups.<name>] external_peers.["*"]accepts anyone on that channel - Set
[web_fetch].allowed_domainsand[http_request].allowed_domains. Fetches run unprompted and the OS sandbox does not block egress - Run one-shot tasks with
zeroclaw agent -a <alias> -m "<task>". A cron or webhook turn has no prompt, so shell calls fall to the command policy
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Grok Bot or ZeroClaw?
ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Grok Bot's 45.2 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are Grok Bot and ZeroClaw open source?
No open-source release is listed for Grok Bot. ZeroClaw is open source (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Grok Bot or ZeroClaw
- AstrBot vs Grok Bot
- AstrBot vs ZeroClaw
- CowAgent vs Grok Bot
- CowAgent vs ZeroClaw
- GAIA vs Grok Bot
- GAIA vs ZeroClaw
- Gemini Spark vs Grok Bot
- Gemini Spark vs ZeroClaw
- Grok Bot vs Haven
- Grok Bot vs Hermes Agent
- Grok Bot vs Instinct
- Grok Bot vs IronClaw
- Grok Bot vs Leon
- Grok Bot vs Lindy
- Grok Bot vs nanobot
- Grok Bot vs NanoClaw
- Grok Bot vs Dots
- Grok Bot vs OpenClaw
- Grok Bot vs PicoClaw
- Grok Bot vs Poke
- Grok Bot vs QwenPaw
- Grok Bot vs Zo Computer
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Hermes Agent vs ZeroClaw
- Instinct vs ZeroClaw
- IronClaw vs ZeroClaw
- Leon vs ZeroClaw
- Lindy vs ZeroClaw
- nanobot vs ZeroClaw
- NanoClaw vs ZeroClaw
- Dots vs ZeroClaw
- OpenClaw vs ZeroClaw
- PicoClaw vs ZeroClaw
- Poke vs ZeroClaw
- QwenPaw vs ZeroClaw
- ZeroClaw vs Zo Computer
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/grok-bot-vs-zeroclaw.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/grok-bot.json·/api/v1/tools/zeroclaw.json - From a terminal
anchor compare grok-bot zeroclaw(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "grok-bot", "b": "zeroclaw"}at/mcp, no key