Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
Orchid vs ZeroClaw
ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Orchid's 20.2 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Orchid F
Best for A founder or operator who wants Gmail and calendar triage by text with approval before anything leaves.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where ZeroClaw loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
ZeroClaw BB
Best for One person who wants an assistant on their own hardware that answers on Telegram, Discord, Matrix or email, asks before it writes or runs commands, and works with a local model.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 74 against 50
- Schema & documentation, 82 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 0
- Security & auth, 76 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 10
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 24
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
The docs state that command execution is not audited. [security.audit] records certificate events only, and tool receipts are opt-in and not durable
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Orchid | ZeroClaw | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 74 | ZeroClaw +24 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 82 | ZeroClaw +72 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 72 | ZeroClaw +72 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 76 | ZeroClaw +76 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 60 | ZeroClaw +50 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 24 | 80 | ZeroClaw +56 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 64 | ZeroClaw +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | F 20.2/100 | BB 70.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Orchid | ZeroClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Zero Email, Inc. | ZeroClaw Labs |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Orchid's Terms of Service (Zero Email, Inc., last updated 16 January 2026). | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-05 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | none | 33k stars |
Verdicts
Orchid
Orchid is a paid executive assistant over iMessage, SMS and Telegram that holds drafts and calendar holds until the owner approves, with a public status page and a named subprocessor list. No outside agent can call it, there's no free tier, and its privacy policy allows training a personal model while its blog says it never trains.
ZeroClaw
Supervised autonomy is the default, so tools outside a short read-only list wait for the owner's approval, and secrets are encrypted in the config file. The docs state that command execution is not written to an audit log, and the project publishes no privacy policy or terms.
Before you call either
Orchid
- Don't plan to call Orchid from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, SMS and Telegram threads.
- Check status.orchid.ai before telling the owner Orchid is down. The 7 August incident moved it to a new number.
- Tell the owner that drafts and holds wait for their approval unless they widen it.
ZeroClaw
- Keep
[risk_profiles.<alias>] level = "supervised".fullruns every tool not listed inalways_ask, and the YOLO preset removes the sandbox and path rules too - Add sending and account tools such as
send_via,google_workspaceandhttp_requesttoalways_askso a session-level Always grant cannot skip the prompt - List senders in
[peer_groups.<name>] external_peers.["*"]accepts anyone on that channel - Set
[web_fetch].allowed_domainsand[http_request].allowed_domains. Fetches run unprompted and the OS sandbox does not block egress - Run one-shot tasks with
zeroclaw agent -a <alias> -m "<task>". A cron or webhook turn has no prompt, so shell calls fall to the command policy
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Orchid or ZeroClaw?
ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Orchid's 20.2 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are Orchid and ZeroClaw open source?
No open-source release is listed for Orchid. ZeroClaw is open source (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Orchid or ZeroClaw
- asaply vs Orchid
- asaply vs ZeroClaw
- Asmi vs Orchid
- Asmi vs ZeroClaw
- AstrBot vs Orchid
- Boba vs Orchid
- Boba vs ZeroClaw
- Boski vs Orchid
- Brea vs Orchid
- Brea vs ZeroClaw
- Caddy vs Orchid
- CowAgent vs Orchid
- Del vs Orchid
- Del vs ZeroClaw
- folk vs Orchid
- GAIA vs Orchid
- Grok Bot vs Orchid
- Haven vs Orchid
- Hermes Agent vs Orchid
- HireAlpha vs Orchid
- HireAlpha vs ZeroClaw
- Instinct vs Orchid
- IronClaw vs Orchid
- Lindy vs Orchid
- nanobot vs Orchid
- NanoClaw vs Orchid
- Dots vs Orchid
- OpenClaw vs Orchid
- OpenInstinct vs Orchid
- OpenInstinct vs ZeroClaw
- Orbits vs Orchid
- Orbits vs ZeroClaw
- Orchid vs Pally
- Orchid vs PicoClaw
- Orchid vs Poke
- Orchid vs QwenPaw
- Orchid vs szn
- Orchid vs Tab
- Orchid vs Tomo
- Orchid vs Town
- Orchid vs Zapia
- Orchid vs Zo Computer
- szn vs ZeroClaw
- Tab vs ZeroClaw
- Zapia vs ZeroClaw
- AstrBot vs ZeroClaw
- Boski vs ZeroClaw
- Caddy vs ZeroClaw
- CowAgent vs ZeroClaw
- folk vs ZeroClaw
- GAIA vs ZeroClaw
- Gemini Spark vs ZeroClaw
- Grok Bot vs ZeroClaw
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Hermes Agent vs ZeroClaw
- Instinct vs ZeroClaw
- IronClaw vs ZeroClaw
- Leon vs ZeroClaw
- Lindy vs ZeroClaw
- nanobot vs ZeroClaw
- NanoClaw vs ZeroClaw
- Dots vs ZeroClaw
- OpenClaw vs ZeroClaw
- PicoClaw vs ZeroClaw
- Poke vs ZeroClaw
- QwenPaw vs ZeroClaw
- Town vs ZeroClaw
- ZeroClaw vs Zo Computer
- Gemini Spark vs Orchid
- Leon vs Orchid
- Natura tinyNature vs Orchid
- Natura tinyNature vs ZeroClaw
- Orchid vs Wajo (Fo)
- Pally vs ZeroClaw
- Tomo vs ZeroClaw
- Wajo (Fo) vs ZeroClaw
- Orchid vs Talorys
- Talorys vs ZeroClaw
Disclosure
Orchid competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/orchid-ai-vs-zeroclaw.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/orchid-ai.json·/api/v1/tools/zeroclaw.json - From a terminal
anchor compare orchid-ai zeroclaw(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "orchid-ai", "b": "zeroclaw"}at/mcp, no key